Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260488.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488. eCollection 2021.

Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs

Affiliations

Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs

Beshir M Ali et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Analysis of consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for sustainable foods produced using new agri-food technologies is required to enhance the uptake of innovations that accelerate the transition towards sustainable food systems. Consumers' willingness to buy new food products, with no or limited consumption experience, mainly depends on their food choice motivational orientations (promotion- vs prevention-orientation). The objective of this study was to elicit consumers' WTP for foods that are produced with microbial applications during the plant production phase with the aim to reduce the use of synthetic chemicals in crop farming, as well as to understand the associations of food choice motives, personal and socio-demographic factors with the WTP. We used contingent valuation to elicit consumers' WTP for three food products (wheat bread, consumer potatoes and tomato sauce) through online surveys. Data were collected from 291 consumers, primarily from Italy, Germany and the Netherlands. Descriptive statistics, latent variable modelling and logistic regression were used to analysis data. Results show that more than two-third of the respondents are willing to pay premiums of at least 0.11 euro per kg of food products for reductions in synthetic chemical use by at least 50% due to microbial applications. The amount of WTP increases with the level of reductions in synthetic chemical use. The majority of the respondents are promotion-oriented consumers in relation to their food involvement, and are more likely to pay premiums for the sustainably produced food products. Environmentally concerned consumers are also more likely to pay premiums, whereas health concerned consumers are not. This study contributes to understanding of consumers' attitude and perceived health risks towards foods obtained using microbial applications, and the heterogeneity of their preferences. Results provide insights for identifying potential buyers of foods produced using microbial applications, and to set prices according to the levels of consumers' WTP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Representation of the willingness to pay and latent variable models used in the analysis.
Note: Observed and latent variables are depicted in squares and ellipses, respectively.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Frequency of responses for WTP for food products that are produced with microbial applications.
Note: WTP_20%, WTP_50%, WTP_80% and WTP_100% refer to respondents’ WTP premiums for 1 kg of food product (consumer potato/wheat bread/tomato sauce) that is produced with a 20%, 50%, 80% and 100% less synthetical chemical use in primary production by replacement with microbial applications, respectively. The figures in the parenthesis refer to number of respondents.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Frequency of responses for the food choice motive indicators.
Refer to Table 1 for the complete statements for FCM1 to FCM11.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tobi RC, Harris F, Rana R, Brown KA, Quaife M, Green R. Sustainable diet dimensions. Comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling: a systematic review. Sustainability. 2019. Jan;11(23):6575. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans D, Southerton D, McMeekin A. Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practice. 2012. In: Warde A and Southerton D (eds) The Habits of Consumption. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, pp. 113–129.
    1. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2019. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. 2019. Accessed on 30 June 2021 from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/11/SRCCL-Full-Report-Compil....
    1. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. AQUASTAT database: FAO’s Global Information System on Water and Agriculture. 2021. Accessed on 30 June 2021 from http://www.fao.org/aquastat/statistics/query/results.html.
    1. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. Feeding people, protecting the planet: FAO and the GEF: partners in action. 2018. Accessed on 30 June 2021 from https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/FAOandGEFpub_062....

Publication types