Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;27(5):470-489.
doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00350.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae

Affiliations
Free article

Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae

Rolando T Bárcenas et al. Cladistics. 2011 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Bayesian, maximum-likelihood, and maximum-parsimony phylogenies, constructed using nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene region trnK-matK, are employed to investigate relationships within the Cactaceae. These phylogenies sample 666 plants representing 532 of the 1438 species recognized in the family. All four subfamilies, all nine tribes, and 69% of currently recognized genera of Cactaceae are sampled. We found strong support for three of the four currently recognized subfamilies, although relationships between subfamilies were not well defined. Major clades recovered within the largest subfamilies, Opuntioideae and Cactoideae, are reviewed; only three of the nine currently accepted tribes delimited within these subfamilies, the Cacteae, Rhipsalideae, and Opuntieae, are monophyletic, although the Opuntieae were recovered in only the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood analyses, not in the maximum-parsimony analysis, and more data are needed to reveal the status of the Cylindropuntieae, which may yet be monophyletic. Of the 42 genera with more than one exemplar in our study, only 17 were monophyletic; 14 of these genera were from subfamily Cactoideae and three from subfamily Opuntioideae. We present a synopsis of the status of the currently recognized genera. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, E.F., 2001. The Cactus Family. Timber Press, Cambridge, UK.
    1. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., 2006. Análisis cladístico del género Pachycereus (Cactaceae) con caracteres morfológicos. Brittonia 58, 197-216.
    1. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., 2009. Taxonomic revision of Pachycereus (Cactaceae). Syst. Bot. 34, 68-83.
    1. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., Cameron, K., 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 28, 547-557.
    1. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., Arreola-Nava, H.J., Vazquez-Sanchez, M., Cameron, K.M., 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in Peniocereus (Cactaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence data. J. Plant. Res. 118, 317-328.

LinkOut - more resources