Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;35(25):8968-8974.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2008895. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

Glycemic variability and indices of glycemic control among pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) based on the use of continuous glucose monitoring share technology

Affiliations

Glycemic variability and indices of glycemic control among pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) based on the use of continuous glucose monitoring share technology

Julie Sklar et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience high levels of glycemic variability, which may be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, strategies that help pregnant women with T1D manage their glycemic control are of great interest.

Methods: We examined associations with or without remote monitoring of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) data by friends and family with indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability during pregnancies complicated by T1D in a pilot non-randomized trial (n = 28). During preconception or the first trimester, participants were placed in one of two groups based on device compatibility: (1) CGM Alone (n = 13): women without iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch; or (2) CGM Share (n = 15): women with iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch and followers with devices compatible for data viewing. Linear mixed models were used to compare indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability over time between groups.

Results: Participants using CGM Share had lower estimated HbA1c levels over time (p = .028), glucose management index (p = .041), and fewer glucose excursions >200 mg/dL in each trimester (p = .022) compared to those using CGM Alone. Participants using CGM Alone had higher high blood glucose index (p = .020), mean area under the curve (p = .026), and standard deviation (p = .046) compared to those using CGM Share. Other measures of glycemic variability did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: In this non-randomized pilot study, use of CGM Share was associated with improvements in several indices of glycemic control and glycemic variability.

Keywords: Type 1 diabetes; continuous glucose monitoring; glucose monitoring; glycemic variability; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources