Implementing standard antenatal care interventions: health system cost at primary health facilities in Tanzania
- PMID: 34876154
- PMCID: PMC8650535
- DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00325-0
Implementing standard antenatal care interventions: health system cost at primary health facilities in Tanzania
Abstract
Background: Since 2002, Tanzania has been implementing the focused Antenatal Care (ANC) model that recommended four antenatal care visits. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) reintroduced the standard ANC model with more interventions including a minimum of eight contacts. However, cost-implications of these changes to the health system are unknown, particularly in countries like Tanzania, that failed to optimally implement the simpler focused ANC model. We compared the health system cost of providing ANC under the focused and the standard models at primary health facilities in Tanzania.
Methods: We used a micro-costing approach to identify and quantify resources used to implement the focused ANC model at six primary health facilities in Tanzania from July 2018 to June 2019. We also used the standard ANC implementation manual to identify and quantify additional resources required. We used basic salary and allowances to value personnel time while the Medical Store Department price catalogue and local market prices were used for other resources. Costs were collected in Tanzanian shillings and converted to 2018 US$.
Results: The health system cost of providing ANC services at six facilities (2 health centres and 4 dispensaries) was US$185,282 under the focused model. We estimated that the cost would increase by about 90% at health centres and 97% at dispensaries to US$358,290 by introducing the standard model. Personnel cost accounted for more than one third of the total cost, and more than two additional nurses are required per facility for the standard model. The costs per pregnancy increased from about US$33 to US$63 at health centres and from about US$37 to US$72 at dispensaries.
Conclusion: Introduction of a standard ANC model at primary health facilities in Tanzania may double resources requirement compared to current practice. Resources availability has been one of the challenges to effective implementation of the current focused ANC model. More research is required, to consider whether the additional costs are reasonable compared to the additional value for maternal and child health.
Keywords: Antenatal care; Cost; Health system; Primary health care; Tanzania.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing Antenatal Care Recommendations for Positive Pregnancy Outcomes at Public Primary Facilities in Tanzania.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00923-y. Epub 2024 Oct 26. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 39461924 Free PMC article.
-
How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Jun 23;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006. PMID: 16796749 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency of antenatal care and childbirth services in selected primary health care facilities in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-96. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 24581003 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative exploration of health workers' and clients' perceptions of barriers to completing four antenatal care visits in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw034. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Health Policy Plan. 2016. PMID: 27117481
-
e-income countries from a provider's perspective: a systematic review.BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):e002371. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002371. BMJ Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32565428 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The economic costs of orthopaedic services: a health system cost analysis of tertiary hospitals in a low-income country.Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 17;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00485-8. Health Econ Rev. 2024. PMID: 38367132 Free PMC article.
-
Antenatal care services utilization and their associated factors among postnatal women in Dodoma city: a cross-sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07118-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40082813 Free PMC article.
-
Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing Antenatal Care Recommendations for Positive Pregnancy Outcomes at Public Primary Facilities in Tanzania.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00923-y. Epub 2024 Oct 26. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 39461924 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Focused Antenatal Care Utilization Among Women in Simiyu Region Tanzania.SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Apr 20;9:23779608231170728. doi: 10.1177/23779608231170728. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023. PMID: 37113997 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Antenatal Care Randomized Trial Manual for the implementation of the New Model. Geneva: World health organization; 2002.
-
- World Health Organization. Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Report No.: 9241549912. - PubMed
-
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Tuncalp O, Metin Gulmezoglu A. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(4):529–39. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13819. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources