Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 14;27(42):7240-7246.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i42.7240.

Digital surgery for gastroenterological diseases

Affiliations
Review

Digital surgery for gastroenterological diseases

Niall Philip Hardy et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Advances in machine learning, computer vision and artificial intelligence methods, in combination with those in processing and cloud computing capability, portend the advent of true decision support during interventions in real-time and soon perhaps in automated surgical steps. Such capability, deployed alongside technology intraoperatively, is termed digital surgery and can be delivered without the need for high-end capital robotic investment. An area close to clinical usefulness right now harnesses advances in near infrared endolaparoscopy and fluorescence guidance for tissue characterisation through the use of biophysics-inspired algorithms. This represents a potential synergistic methodology for the deep learning methods currently advancing in ophthalmology, radiology, and recently gastroenterology via colonoscopy. As databanks of more general surgical videos are created, greater analytic insights can be derived across the operative spectrum of gastroenterological disease and operations (including instrumentation and operative step sequencing and recognition, followed over time by surgeon and instrument performance assessment) and linked to value-based outcomes. However, issues of legality, ethics and even morality need consideration, as do the limiting effects of monopolies, cartels and isolated data silos. Furthermore, the role of the surgeon, surgical societies and healthcare institutions in this evolving field needs active deliberation, as the default risks relegation to bystander or passive recipient. This editorial provides insight into this accelerating field by illuminating the near-future and next decade evolutionary steps towards widespread clinical integration for patient and societal benefit.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Biophysics; Deep learning; Digital surgery; Fluorescence-guided surgery; Gastrointestinal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Cahill RA receives speaker fees from Stryker Corp, Johnson and Johnson/Ethicon and Olympus, consultancy fees from Touch Surgery and DistalMotion, and research funding from Intuitive Surgery. Cahill RA also holds research funding from EU Horizon 2020 with Palliare and the Irish Government in collaboration with IBM Research in Ireland and Deciphex. Hardy NP is employed as a researcher in this collaboration.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Digital surgery in action–real-time discrimination of tissue nature using fluorescence imaging and artificial intelligence. A: Transanal imaging of a rectal lesion using a Pinpoint (Novadaq, Mississauga, Canada; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, United States) near infrared imaging system; B: Following intravenous administration of indocyanine green (ICG) (0.25 mg/kg), fluorescence is observed within the lesion and surrounding tissue; C: In tandem with the ICG administration, regions of interest within healthy and unhealthy tissue (regions 0–3) are chosen by the surgeon for real-time assessment. Image tracking is performed using the visible light mode and light intensity readings extracted from the corresponding regions within the infrared spectrum video for each of these regions over time; D: Intensity profiles are subsequently fitted to biophysics-inspired artificial intelligence models of fluid movement in tissue to predict tissue nature with a binary outcome (healthy vs cancer) and a probability score (%).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission. Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. Brussels. 2021. [cited 1 June 2021]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC02... .
    1. US Food and Drug Association (FDA) Gastrointestinal lesion software detection Regulation Number 21 CRF 876.1520. 2021. [cited 1 June 2021]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf20/DEN200055.pdf .
    1. Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, Ferrara E, Spadaccini M, Alkandari A, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Galtieri PA, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Lorenzetti R, Andrealli A, Antonelli G, Wallace M, Sharma P, Rosch T, Hassan C. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:512–520.e7. - PubMed
    1. Yang YJ, Bang CS. Application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1666–1683. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abadir AP, Ali MF, Karnes W, Samarasena JB. Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2020;53:132–141. - PMC - PubMed