Evidence-based Surgical Competency Outcomes from the Clinical Readiness Program
- PMID: 34879053
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005324
Evidence-based Surgical Competency Outcomes from the Clinical Readiness Program
Abstract
Objectives: 1) Evaluate the value and strength of a competency framework for identifying and measuring performance requirements for expeditionary surgeons; 2) Verify psychometric integrity of assessment instrumentation for measuring domain knowledge and skills; 3) Identify gaps in knowledge and skills capabilities using assessment strategies; 4) Examine shared variance between knowledge and skills outcomes, and the volume and diversity of routine surgical practice.
Background: Expeditionary military surgeons provide care for patients with injuries that extend beyond the care requirements of their routine surgical practice. The readiness of these surgeons to independently provide accurate care in expeditionary contexts is important for casualty care in military and civilian situations. Identifying and closing performance gap areas are essential for assuring readiness.
Methods: We implemented evidence-based processes for identifying and measuring the essential performance competencies for expeditionary surgeons. All assessment instrumentation was rigorously examined for psychometric integrity. Performance outcomes were directly measured for expeditionary surgical knowledge and skills and gap areas were identified. Knowledge and skills assessment outcomes were compared, and also compared to the volume and diversity of routine surgical practice to determine shared variance.
Results: Outcomes confirmed the integrity of assessment instrumentation and identified significant performance gaps for knowledge and skills in the domain.
Conclusions: Identification of domain competencies and performance benchmarks, combined with best-practices in assessment instrumentation, provided a rigorous and defensible framework for quantifying domain competencies. By identifying and implementing strategies for closing performance gap areas, we provide a positive process for assuring surgical competency and clinical readiness.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Hall A, Speegle D, Glaser J. Civilian-military trauma partnerships and the visiting surgeon model for maintaining medical readiness. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:740–744.
-
- Edwards MA, White JE, Remick KN, et al. Army general surgery’s crisis of conscience. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:1190e1194.
-
- Department of Defense Instruction. DoDI 6025.19] (IMR). June 9, 2014. Available at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/602519p.pdf Accessed June 26, 2021.
-
- Wooten W. Using knowledge, skill and ability (KSA) data to identify career pathing opportunities: an application of job analysis to internal manpower planning. Public Personnel Manage. 1993;22:551–563.
-
- Shippmann JS, Ash RA, Battista M, et al. The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychol. 2000;53:703–740.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous