Abortion Safety and Use with Normally Prescribed Mifepristone in Canada
- PMID: 34879191
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa2109779
Abortion Safety and Use with Normally Prescribed Mifepristone in Canada
Abstract
Background: In the United States, mifepristone is available for medical abortion (for use with misoprostol) only with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) restrictions, despite an absence of evidence to support such restrictions. Mifepristone has been available in Canada with a normal prescription since November 2017.
Methods: Using population-based administrative data from Ontario, Canada, we examined abortion use, safety, and effectiveness using an interrupted time-series analysis comparing trends in incidence before mifepristone was available (January 2012 through December 2016) with trends after its availability without restrictions (November 7, 2017, through March 15, 2020).
Results: A total of 195,183 abortions were performed before mifepristone was available and 84,032 after its availability without restrictions. After the availability of mifepristone with a normal prescription, the abortion rate continued to decline, although more slowly than was expected on the basis of trends before mifepristone had been available (adjusted risk difference in time-series analysis, 1.2 per 1000 female residents between 15 and 49 years of age; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 1.4), whereas the percentage of abortions provided as medical procedures increased from 2.2% to 31.4% (adjusted risk difference, 28.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 28.0 to 29.7). There were no material changes between the period before mifepristone was available and the nonrestricted period in the incidence of severe adverse events (0.03% vs. 0.04%; adjusted risk difference, 0.01 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.03), complications (0.74% vs. 0.69%; adjusted risk difference, 0.06 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.18), or ectopic pregnancy detected after abortion (0.15% vs. 0.22%; adjusted risk difference, -0.03 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.09). There was a small increase in ongoing intrauterine pregnancy continuing to delivery (adjusted risk difference, 0.08 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.10).
Conclusions: After mifepristone became available as a normal prescription, the abortion rate remained relatively stable, the proportion of abortions provided by medication increased rapidly, and adverse events and complications remained stable, as compared with the period when mifepristone was unavailable. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Women's Health Research Institute.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Similar articles
-
Deaths and Severe Adverse Events after the use of Mifepristone as an Abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019.Issues Law Med. 2021 Spring;36(1):3-26. Issues Law Med. 2021. PMID: 33939340
-
Mifepristone-induced abortion and vaginal bleeding in subsequent pregnancy.Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 May 4. Contraception. 2011. PMID: 22078190
-
Outcomes During Early Implementation of Mifepristone-Buccal Misoprostol Abortions up to 63 Days of Gestation in a Canadian Clinical Setting.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 May;41(5):647-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Oct 26. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019. PMID: 31007171
-
Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management.Reprod Health Matters. 2008 May;16(31 Suppl):162-72. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31371-8. Reprod Health Matters. 2008. PMID: 18772097 Review.
-
Early abortion. Update and implications for midwifery practice.J Nurse Midwifery. 1998 Nov-Dec;43(6):492-501. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(98)00057-3. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998. PMID: 9871382 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e066650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36385017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nurse practitioners on 'the leading edge' of medication abortion care: A feminist qualitative approach.J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb;79(2):686-697. doi: 10.1111/jan.15487. Epub 2022 Nov 11. J Adv Nurs. 2023. PMID: 36369652 Free PMC article.
-
Personhood Begins at Birth: The Rational Foundation for Abortion Policy in a Secular State.J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):751-769. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10352-0. Epub 2024 Aug 22. J Bioeth Inq. 2024. PMID: 39172346
-
Home use of mifepristone for medical abortion: a systematic review.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 10;51(3):221-231. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202302. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39384382 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in local access to mifepristone dispensed by community pharmacies for medication abortion in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.CMAJ. 2025 Apr 6;197(13):E345-E354. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241505. CMAJ. 2025. PMID: 40194816 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- Canada Chair in Prevention and Control of Hyperten/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- Early Career Researcher: ECI-167971/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- Health System Impact Fellowship 2018 Schummers/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- Patient-Oriented Research Award - Transition to/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- Project Grant PJT-168964 2020-24/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- Public Health Research Chair: CPP-329455-107837 20/Institute of Health Services and Policy Research
- 18183/Ministry of Health, British Columbia
- 17934/Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
- 2012-5139 HSR/Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
- Canada Research Chair in Access to Medicines/Canada Research Chairs
- Early Career Fellowship (APP1110230)/National Health and Medical Research Council
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical