Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Revascularization Using No-Touch Versus Conventional Saphenous Vein Grafts: Mid-Term Follow-Up of Propensity Score Matched Cohorts
- PMID: 34879223
- DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.12.002
Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Revascularization Using No-Touch Versus Conventional Saphenous Vein Grafts: Mid-Term Follow-Up of Propensity Score Matched Cohorts
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated superior patency of no-touch as compared to conventional saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting. We aimed to compare mid-term clinical outcomes of both techniques in a large cohort of routine patients. We identified all patients undergoing nonemergent primary coronary artery bypass grafting with either no-touch or conventional saphenous vein grafts at our institution between 2000 and 2020. Propensity score matching was used to create adjusted cohorts based on 5288 eligible patients. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes were individual rates of all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization, surgical complications, and short-term mortality. Propensity score matching resulted in cohorts of no-touch (n = 923) and conventional (n = 923) saphenous vein grafted patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Mean follow-up time was significantly shorter for the no-touch compared to the conventional cohort (4.9 ± 2.3 vs 8.3 ± 2.6 years, P < 0.001). Up to 7-year follow-up, neither the rate of the primary composite endpoint nor death differed significantly between the cohorts. The rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in patients in the no-touch cohort (12.9% vs 9.3% at 7-year follow-up, P = 0.022. Post-hoc analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention during follow-up revealed comparable rates of saphenous vein graft failure (no-touch 42/923 (4.6%) vs conventional 32/923 (3.5%), P = 0.286). In this large propensity score matched registry study, coronary artery bypass with no-touch compared to conventional saphenous vein grafting did neither enhance mid-term survival nor reduce the rate of repeat revascularization.
Keywords: Clinical outcomes; Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Mid-term follow-up; No-touch saphenous vein grafts; Propensity score matching.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting May Improve Further the Patency of Saphenous Vein Composite Grafts: Early Outcomes and 1-Year Angiographic Results.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1489-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 27916241 Clinical Trial.
-
Sequential Versus Individual Saphenous Vein Grafting During Coronary Arterial Bypass Surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr;109(4):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.094. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31539513
-
Long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with pedicled saphenous vein grafts.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov 26;13(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0800-z. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. PMID: 30477543 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):179-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8228. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32662861 Free PMC article.
-
Twenty-Five Years of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Structural Observations and Impact on Graft Performance.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):91-99. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0238. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32270965 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of the no-touch harvesting technique on the vessel diameter of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting.JTCVS Tech. 2022 Jul 12;15:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.07.005. eCollection 2022 Oct. JTCVS Tech. 2022. PMID: 36276697 Free PMC article.
-
[Transcriptome sequencing for identification of the genes associated with restenosis of venous grafts in rabbits].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Oct 20;43(10):1804-1809. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.10.20. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023. PMID: 37933658 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of no-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques in coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open Heart. 2025 Jul 21;12(2):e003391. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003391. Open Heart. 2025. PMID: 40695535 Free PMC article.
-
Graft patency of no-touch versus conventionally harvested saphenous vein conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: A frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized trials.JTCVS Open. 2025 Feb 21;24:185-205. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.007. eCollection 2025 Apr. JTCVS Open. 2025. PMID: 40309673 Free PMC article.
-
No-touch vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a registry-based randomized clinical trial.Eur Heart J. 2025 May 7;46(18):1720-1729. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf018. Eur Heart J. 2025. PMID: 39969129 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical