Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:50:631-635.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.046. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

A new predictor for indicating clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients: Frontal QRS-T angle

Metin Ocak  1 , Mustafa Begenc Tascanov  2 , Nur Şimşek Yurt  3 , Yusuf Can Yurt  4
Affiliations

A new predictor for indicating clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients: Frontal QRS-T angle

Metin Ocak et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: COVID-19; It spread rapidly around the world and led to a global pandemic. Indicators of poor prognosis are important in the treatment and follow-up of COVID-19 patients and have always been a matter of interest to researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between frontal QRS-T angle values and clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted with 130 COVID-19 patients whose diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 100 healthy controls. The CURB-65 score was used as the clinical severity score.

Results: A total of 130 patients and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. When the patient and control groups were compared a significant difference was found between QT (378.07 ± 33.75 vs. 368.63 ± 19.65, p < 0.001), QTc (410.79 ± 28.19 vs. 403.68 ± 11.70, p < 0.001), QRS time (95.04 ± 21.67 vs. 91.42 ± 11.08, p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle (36.57 ± 22.86 vs. 22.72 ± 14.08, p < 0.001). According to clinical severity scoring, QT (370.27 ± 25.20 vs. 387.75 ± 40.19, p = 0.003), QTc (402.18 ± 19.92 vs. 421.48 ± 33.08, p < 0.001), frontal QRS-T angle (32.25 ± 18.79 vs. 41.94 ± 26.27), p = 0.0.16) parameters were found to be significantly different. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.111-1.298; p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.045; 95% [CI], 1.015-1.075; p = 0.003) values were found to be an independent predictor for the severity of the disease. Frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.101; 95% [CI], 1.030-1.176; p = 0.004), and CRP ([OR], 1.029; 95% [CI], 1.007-1.051; p = 0.01) parameters were found to be independent predictors for the mortality of the disease. As a mortality indicator; for the frontal QRS-T angle of ≥44.5°, specificity and sensitivity were 93.8% and 84.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: Frontal QRS-T angle can be used as a reproducible, convenient, inexpensive, new and powerful predictor in determining the clinical severity and prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; Frontal QRS-T angle; Mortality; QT; QTc; Ventricular arrhythmia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC analysis of f(QRS-T) angle.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Ma L., Song K., Huang Y. Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular complications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jun;35(6):1860–1865. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poortahmasebi V., Zandi M., Soltani S., Jazayeri S.M. Clinical performance of RT-PCR and chest CT scan for Covid-19 diagnosis; a systematic review. Adv J Emerg Med. 2020;4(2s):1–7.
    1. WHO. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.18June 2021. 2021 [cited 20.06.2021].
    1. Gallo Marin B., Aghagoli G., Lavine K., Yang L., Siff E.J., Chiang S.S., et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: a literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497–506. - PMC - PubMed