Changes in Outcomes after Discharge from an Acute Hospital in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- PMID: 34880162
- PMCID: PMC8918365
- DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0217
Changes in Outcomes after Discharge from an Acute Hospital in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
Neurological improvement occurs from the subacute to chronic phases in severe traumatic brain injury. We analyzed factors associated with improved neurological findings in the subacute phase, using data from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB). The subjects were 1345 patients registered in the JNTDB (Project 2015). Clinical improvement was evaluated by comparing the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge and 6 months after injury. Of these patients, 157 with severe disability (SD) on the discharge GOS were examined to evaluate factors associated with neurological improvement in the subacute phase. Cases were defined as those with (group I) and without (group N) improvement: a change from SD at discharge to good recovery (GR) or moderate disability (MD) at 6 months after injury. Patient background, admission findings, treatment, and discharge destination were examined. In all patients, the favorable outcome (GR, MD) rate improved from 30.2% at discharge to 35.7% at 6 months after injury. Of SD cases at discharge, 44.6% had a favorable outcome at 6 months (group I). Patients in group I were significantly younger, and had a significantly lower D-dimer level in initial blood tests and a lower incidence of convulsions. In multivariate analysis, discharge to home was a significant factor associated with an improved outcome. Many SD cases at discharge ultimately showed neurological improvement, and the initial D-dimer level may be a predictor of such improvement. The environment after discharge from an acute care hospital may also contribute to an improved long-term prognosis.
Keywords: biomarker; discharge destination; outcome improvement; rehabilitation; traumatic brain injury.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Yokobori S, Yamaguchi M, Igarashi Y, et al. : Outcome and refractory factor of intensive treatment for geriatric traumatic brain injury: analysis of 1165 cases registered in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. World Neurosurg 86: 127–133.e1, 2016 - PubMed
-
- Katsuki M, Kakizawa Y, Nishikawa A, et al. : Fifteen cases of endoscopic treatment of acute subdural hematoma with small craniotomy under local anesthesia: endoscopic hematoma removal reduces the intraoperative bleeding amount and the operative time compared with craniotomy in patients aged 70 or older. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 60: 439–449, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vedantam A, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP: Clinical characteristics and temporal profile of recovery in patients with favorable outcomes at 6 months after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 129: 234–240, 2018 - PubMed
-
- Corral L, Ventura JL, Herrero JI, et al. : Improvement in GOS and GOSE scores 6 and 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 21: 1225–1231, 2007 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical