Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;14(4):242-247.
doi: 10.1177/1753495X211011915. Epub 2021 May 12.

Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention

Affiliations

Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention

Kelle D Hurd et al. Obstet Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based training's impact on learning outcomes may be related to cognitive load or emotions during training. We evaluated the association of validated measures of cognitive load and emotion with learning outcomes in simulation-based obstetric internal medicine cases.

Methods: All internal medicine learners (n = 15) who completed the knowledge test pre-training, post-training (knowledge acquisition), and at 3-6 months (knowledge retention) for all three simulation cases were included.

Results: Mean knowledge scores differed over time in all three cases (p < 0.0001 for all). Knowledge retention scores were significantly higher only for cases 1 and 3. Cognitive load associated with frustration was positively associated with knowledge acquisition for case 2 (beta = 5.18, P = 0.007), while excitement was negatively associated with knowledge retention in case 1 (beta = -33.07, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Simulation-based education for obstetric internal medicine can be effective in select cases. Attention to cognitive load and emotion may optimize learning outcomes.

Keywords: Simulation training; cognitive load; graduate medical education; patient simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: IWYM is the Chair Holder of the John A. Buchanan Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean knowledge assessment scores for three simulation cases, each conducted at three time points (pre-simulation, post-simulation, and at 3–6 months). Error bars indicate standard deviation. (a) Knowledge assessment scores for case one. (b) Knowledge assessment scores for case two. (c) Knowledge assessment scores for case three.

References

    1. Objectives of Training in the Specialty of Internal Medicine. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/ibd/internal_medicine_otr_e.pdf (2011, accessed 28 January 2021).
    1. Objectives of Training in the Subspecialty of General Internal Medicine. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/ibd/general_internal_medicine_otr_e... (2012, accessed 28 January 2021).
    1. Card SE, Snell L, O’Brien B. Are Canadian General Internal Medicine training program graduates well prepared for their future careers? BMC Med Educ 2006; 6: 56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al.. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306: 978–988. - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, et al.. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 2012; 7: 308–320. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources