Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;22(6):252-258.
doi: 10.1177/17571774211033351. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

What are the predictors of hand hygiene compliance in the intensive care unit? A cross-sectional observational study

Affiliations

What are the predictors of hand hygiene compliance in the intensive care unit? A cross-sectional observational study

Caoimhe Madden et al. J Infect Prev. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Although appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are recognised as the most effective preventative strategy for infection, adherence is suboptimal. Previous studies in intensive care units (ICUs) have found differences in HH compliance between those moments that protect the patient, and those that protect the healthcare provider. However, such studies did not control for other variables known to impact HH compliance.

Aim: To examine HH among healthcare workers (HCWs) in ICU settings, and identify whether there is a statistical difference in HH compliance between patient-protective and self-protective moments, while controlling for other variables known to influence HH compliance (i.e. professional role, unit and shift time).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in four ICUs across three Irish hospitals. Compliance was assessed according to the WHO's 'five moments for hand hygiene'. HCW professional role, total number of 'opportunities' for HH and whether compliance was achieved were recorded.

Results: A total of 712 HH opportunities were recorded, with an overall compliance rate of 56.9%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians, allied healthcare professionals and auxiliary staff were less likely than nurses to engage in HH. HCWs were more likely to comply during night shifts compared to morning shifts, and with self-protective as compared to patient-protective HH moments.

Conclusion: The information provided in this study provides a data-driven approach that ICUs can use to tailor HH interventions to where, when and for whom they are most required.

Keywords: Hand hygiene; audit; behaviour; critical care; infection control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AlNakhli DJ, Baig K, Goh A, Sandokji H, Din SS. (2014) Determinants of hand hygiene non-compliance in a cardiac center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 35(2): 147–152. - PubMed
    1. Artman K, Wolery M, Yoder P. (2012) Embracing our visual inspection and analysis tradition: Graphing interobserver agreement data. Remedial and Special Education 33(2): 71–77.
    1. Buchanan DA, Huczynski AA. (2013) Organizational behaviour. London: Pearson.
    1. Chavali S, Menon V, Shukla U. (2014) Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in an accredited tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine 18(10): 689. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erasmus V, Brouwer W, Van Beeck E, Oenema A, Daha T, Richardus JH, Vos MC, Brug J. (2009) A qualitative exploration of reasons for poor hand hygiene among hospital workers lack of positive role models and of convincing evidence that hand hygiene prevents cross-infection. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 30(5): 415–419. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources