Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 4;12(43):14383-14388.
doi: 10.1039/d1sc04666g. eCollection 2021 Nov 10.

Synthesis and electronic structure analysis of the actinide allenylidenes, [{(NR2)3}An(CCCPh2)]- (An = U, Th; R = SiMe3)

Affiliations

Synthesis and electronic structure analysis of the actinide allenylidenes, [{(NR2)3}An(CCCPh2)]- (An = U, Th; R = SiMe3)

Greggory T Kent et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

The reaction of [AnCl(NR2)3] (An = U, Th, R = SiMe3) with in situ generated lithium-3,3-diphenylcyclopropene results in the formation of [{(NR2)3}An(CH[double bond, length as m-dash]C[double bond, length as m-dash]CPh2)] (An = U, 1; Th, 2) in good yields after work-up. Deprotonation of 1 or 2 with LDA/2.2.2-cryptand results in formation of the anionic allenylidenes, [Li(2.2.2-cryptand)][{(NR2)3}An(CCCPh2)] (An = U, 3; Th, 4). The calculated 13C NMR chemical shifts of the Cα, Cβ, and Cγ nuclei in 2 and 4 nicely reproduce the experimentally assigned order, and exhibit a characteristic spin-orbit induced downfield shift at Cα due to involvement of the 5f orbitals in the Th-C bonds. Additionally, the bonding analyses for 3 and 4 show a delocalized multi-center character of the ligand π orbitals involving the actinide. While a single-triple-single-bond resonance structure (e.g., An-C[triple bond, length as m-dash]C-CPh2) predominates, the An[double bond, length as m-dash]C[double bond, length as m-dash]C[double bond, length as m-dash]CPh2 resonance form contributes, as well, more so for 3 than for 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of complexes 1–4.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Solid-state structure of 1 shown with 50% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Solid-state structure of [Li(2.2.2-cryptand)][{(NR2)3}U(CCCPh2)] (3) shown with 50% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms, [Li(2.2.2-cryptand)], and pentane solvate omitted for clarity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Isosurfaces (±0.03 a.u.) of selected NLMOs for 3 and 4. The α spin NLMOs of 3 are shown, weight-% metal character and 6d vs. 5f contributions at U are averaged over spins.

References

    1. Fortier S. Walensky J. R. Wu G. Hayton T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:6894–6897. doi: 10.1021/ja2001133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper O. J. Mills D. P. McMaster J. Moro F. Davies E. S. Lewis W. Blake A. J. Liddle S. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011;50:2383–2386. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper O. J. Mills D. P. McMaster J. Tuna F. McInnes E. J. L. Lewis W. Blake A. J. Liddle S. T. Chem.–Eur. J. 2013;19:7071–7083. doi: 10.1002/chem.201300071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smiles D. E. Wu G. Hrobárik P. Hayton T. W. Organometallics. 2017;36:4519–4524. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00202. - DOI
    1. Rungthanaphatsophon P. Huang P. Walensky J. R. Organometallics. 2018;37:1884–1891. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00137. - DOI