Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 22:8:734306.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.734306. eCollection 2021.

Improving Access to the Glycated Hemoglobin Test in Rural Communities With Point-of-Care Devices: An Application Study

Affiliations

Improving Access to the Glycated Hemoglobin Test in Rural Communities With Point-of-Care Devices: An Application Study

Marianne Silveira Camargo et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Living in a rural or remote area is frequently associated with impaired access to health services, which directly affects the possibility of early diagnosis and appropriate monitoring of diseases, mainly non-communicable ones, because of their asymptomatic onset and evolution. Point-of-care devices have emerged as useful technologies for improving access to several laboratory tests closely patients' beds or homes, which makes it possible to eliminate the distance barrier. Objective: To evaluate the application of point-of-care technology for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) estimation in the assessment of glycemic control and identification of new diagnoses of diabetes in primary care among rural communities in a Brazilian municipality. Materials and Methods: We included individuals aged 18 years or older among rural communities in a Brazilian municipality. From September 2019 to February 2020, participants were assessed for anthropometrics, blood pressure, and capillary glycemia during routine primary care team activities at health fairs and in patient groups. Participants previously diagnosed with diabetes but without recent HbA1c test results or those without a previous diagnosis but with random capillary glycemia higher than 140 mg/dL were considered positive and were tested for HbA1c by using a point-of-care device. Results: At the end of the study, 913 individuals were accessed. Of these, 600 (65.7%) had no previous diagnosis of diabetes, 58/600 (9.7%) refused capillary glycemia screening and 542/600 (90.7%) were tested. Among tested individuals, 73/542 (13.5%) cases without a previous diagnosis of diabetes, were positive for capillary glycemia. Among positives, 31/73 (42.5%) had HbA1c levels that were considered indicative of prediabetes and 16/73 (21.9%) were newly diagnosed with diabetes. Among the participants, 313/913 (34.3%) were previously diagnosed with diabetes. Recent HbA1c results were unavailable for 210/313 (67.1%). These individuals were tested using point-of-care devices. Among them, 143/210 (68.1%) had HbA1c levels higher than target levels (>7% and >8% for adults and elderly individuals, respectively. Conclusion: The application of point-of-care devices for HbA1c level measurement improved the access to this test for people living in rural or remote areas. Thus, it was possible to include this technology in the routine activities of primary health care teams, which increased the rates of new diagnoses and identification of patients with uncontrolled glycemia.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; glycated hemoglobin A; point-of-care testing; primary health care; rural communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the municipality with the geospatial distribution of the basic health units in the rural area of study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of the screening for capillary glycemia and diagnosis confirmation by HbA1c testing performed using point-of-care test devices.

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2019) 157:107843. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bello AK, Hemmelgarn B, Lin M, Manns B, Klarenbach S, Thompson S. Impact of remote location on quality care delivery and relationships to adverse health outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2012) 27:3849–55. 10.1093/ndt/gfs267 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malcolm S, Cadet J, Crompton L, DeGennaro V. A model for point of care testing for non-communicable disease diagnosis in resource-limited countries. Glob. Health Epidemiol Genom. (2019) 4:e7. 10.1017/gheg.2019.6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spaeth BA, Shephard MD, Schatz S. Point-of-care testing for haemoglobin A1c in remote Australian indigenous communities improves timeliness of diabetes care. Rural Remote Health. (2014) 14:2849. 10.22605/RRH2849 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oster RT, Toth EL. Differences in the prevalence of diabetes risk-factors among first Nation, métis and non-aboriginal adults attending screening clinics in rural Alberta, Canada. Rural Remote Health. (2009) 9:1170. 10.22605/RRH1170 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources