The Safety, Clinical, and Neurophysiological Effects of Intranasal Ketamine in Patients Who Do Not Respond to Electroconvulsive Therapy: Protocol for a Pilot, Open-Label Clinical Trial
- PMID: 34882570
- PMCID: PMC8804953
- DOI: 10.2196/30163
The Safety, Clinical, and Neurophysiological Effects of Intranasal Ketamine in Patients Who Do Not Respond to Electroconvulsive Therapy: Protocol for a Pilot, Open-Label Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder is among the most disabling illnesses worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 16.2%. Research suggests that 20% to 40% of patients with depression do not respond to pharmacotherapy, developing treatment-resistant depression. Electroconvulsive therapy is the gold standard for treating individuals with treatment-resistant depression, with remission rates of approximately 75% to 90%. However, 10% to 25% of patients do not respond to electroconvulsive therapy, and many are unable to tolerate it due to the side effects. Both groups are considered to be patients who do not respond to electroconvulsive therapy, because both groups continue to exhibit symptoms of severe depression, have a limited number of treatment options available, and are in need of rapid treatment. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been shown to exert rapid antidepressant effects in patients with treatment-resistant depression when administered in subanesthetic doses through 40-minute intravenous infusions. Recently, a ketamine compound, esketamine (Spravato), that is administered through the intranasal route received regulatory approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada to treat depression. However, esketamine is challenging to access due to high costs and limited availability. Racemic ketamine (rketamine) is cheap and easy to access; however, the effects in patients who have not responded to electroconvulsive therapy have yet to be understood or tested. This study will use transcranial magnetic stimulation to study mechanisms of human brain cortical physiology at the systemic level to identify neurobiomarkers of response.
Objective: The objective of this open-label pilot clinical trial is to test the feasibility and safety of intranasal ketamine in patients who have not responded to electroconvulsive therapy. The primary outcome is to determine the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of intranasal ketamine for patients who have not responded to electroconvulsive therapy for clinical indicators in unipolar depression. The secondary outcome is to determine the preliminary effects of an intervention on clinical outcomes, such as depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and quality of living. The third outcome is to explore neurophysiological changes as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation electromyography and electroencephalography to measure changes in cortical excitability as potential predictors of clinical response.
Methods: A sterile solution of racemic ketamine hydrochloride will be administered twice per week for 4 weeks (8 sessions) intranasally to patients with treatment-resistant depression who did not respond to or could not tolerate an acute course of electroconvulsive therapy. We will recruit 25 adults (24-65 years old) over the course of 2 years from an academic psychiatric hospital in Toronto, Canada.
Results: This study has received ethics approval, and funding has been secured. The study is currently active.
Conclusions: This is the first study to test repeated doses of intranasal rketamine in patients who have not responded to electroconvulsive therapy for depression. Results from this study will (1) inform the development of a larger adequately powered randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of intranasal ketamine for depression and (2) determine potential neurophysiological markers of clinical response.
Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT05137938; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05137938.
International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/30163.
Keywords: NMDA antagonist; alternative; biomarker; clinical trial; depression; drug; electroconvulsive therapy nonresponders; intranasal; ketamine; mental health; neurophysiological; racemic ketamine; safety; side effect; treatment; treatment resistant depression.
©Yuliya Knyahnytska, Reza Zomorrodi, Tyler Kaster, Daphne Voineskos, Alisson Trevizol, Daniel Blumberger. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.01.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Neural Correlates of the DEEPP (Anti-suicidal Response to Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression) Study: Protocol for a Pilot, Open-Label Clinical Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 27;12:e41013. doi: 10.2196/41013. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 36573651 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Novel "Standard of Care" Treatments-Intranasal Esketamine Versus Intravenous Ketamine-for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Naturalistic Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Pilot Observational Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 23;11(5):e34711. doi: 10.2196/34711. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35604752 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized, crossover comparison of ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of major depressive episodes: a Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) study protocol.BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 2;20(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02672-3. BMC Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32487236 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;15:1325399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1325399. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38362031 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Esketamine's Therapeutic Outcomes as an FDA-Designated Breakthrough for Treatment-Resistant Depression and Major Depressive Disorder With Suicidal Intent: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2024 Feb 10;16(2):e53987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53987. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38476783 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS, National Comorbidity Survey Replication The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095–105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.289/23/3095 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rush A, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, Lavori PW, Trivedi MH, Sackeim HA, Thase ME, Nierenberg AA, Quitkin FM, Kashner T, Kupfer DJ, Rosenbaum JF, Alpert J, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Biggs MM, Shores-Wilson K, Lebowitz BD, Ritz L, Niederehe G, STAR*D Investigators Group Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):119–42. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00112-0.S0197-2456(03)00112-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Husain MM, Rush AJ, Fink M, Knapp R, Petrides G, Rummans T, Biggs MM, O'Connor K, Rasmussen K, Litle M, Zhao W, Bernstein HJ, Smith G, Mueller M, McClintock SM, Bailine SH, Kellner CH. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;65(4):485–91. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0406. - DOI - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous