Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 9;15(12):e0009891.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009891. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Lateral flow devices for samples collected by straw sampling method for postmortem canine rabies diagnosis

Affiliations

Lateral flow devices for samples collected by straw sampling method for postmortem canine rabies diagnosis

Milagros R Mananggit et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

The direct fluorescent antibody test (dFAT) using brain sample after opening the skull is the standard rabies diagnostic test in animal rabies. However, it is not feasible in many resource-limited settings. Lateral flow devices (LFD) combined with a simple sampling methodology is quicker, simpler, and less hazardous than the standard test and can be a useful tool. We conducted a prospective on-site study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LFD with the straw sampling method compared with that of the dFAT with the skull opening procedure for post-mortem canine rabies diagnosis. We collected 97 rabies-suspected animals between December 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Among the 97 samples, 53 and 50 cases were positive tests for dFAT and LFD, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of LFD with straw sampling method were 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.3-98.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 92.0-100%), respectively. The performance of LFD by the straw sampling method showed relatively high sensitivity and 100% specificity compared with that of dFAT performed on samples collected after opening the skull. This methodology can be beneficial and is a strong tool to overcome limited animal surveillance in remote areas. However, because of our limited sample size, more data using fresh samples on-site and the optimizations are urgently needed for the further implementation in endemic areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Banyard AC, Horton DL, Freuling C, Müller T, Fooks AR. Control and prevention of canine rabies: the need for building laboratory-based surveillance capacity. Antivir Res. 2013;98:357–64. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. OIE World Organization for Animal Health. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2019 Chapter 3.1.17 Rabies. [cited 2021 Feb 16]. https://www.oie.int/standard-setting/terrestrial-manual/access-online/
    1. Iamamoto K, Quadros J, Queiroz LH. Use of aspiration method for collecting brain samples for rabies diagnosis in small wild animals. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:28–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01282.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruppercht CE, Fooks AR, Abela-Ridder B, editors. Laboratory techniques in rabies. 5th ed. Volume 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/310836/9789241515153-en...
    1. Patrick EM, Bjorklund BM, Kirby JD, Nelson KM, Chipman RB, Rupprecht CE. Enhanced rabies surveillance using a direct rapid immunohistochemical test. J Vis Exp. 2019;146:e59416. doi: 10.3791/59416 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms