Tacrolimus time in therapeutic range and long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients
- PMID: 34882822
- DOI: 10.1002/phar.2653
Tacrolimus time in therapeutic range and long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients
Abstract
Study objective: Little is known about the association between tacrolimus time in therapeutic range (TTR) within the guideline-recommended targets and heart transplant (HT) patient outcomes. This study evaluated the association of early tacrolimus TTR with rejection and other clinical outcomes during an extended follow-up after HT.
Design: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Setting: The study was conducted at Michigan Medicine (1/1/2006-12/31/2017).
Patients: HT recipients ≥18 years of age were included.
Measurement: The primary end point was the effect of tacrolimus TTR on time to rejection over the entire follow-up period.
Main results: A total of 137 patients were included with a median follow-up of 53 months. Based on the median TTR of 58%, the patients were divided into the low tacrolimus TTR (n = 68) and high tacrolimus TTR (n = 69) cohort. The high tacrolimus TTR was associated with a significantly lower risk of rejection compared to the low tacrolimus TTR cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.98; p = 0.04). A post hoc analysis revealed associations between rejection and TTR when high and low TTR groups were created at different levels. TTR <30% was associated with a 7-fold higher risk of rejection (HR 7.56; 95% CI 1.76-37.6; p < 0.01) and TTR >75% was associated with a 77% lower risk of rejection (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.627; p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Patients in the higher tacrolimus TTR cohort had a lower risk of rejection. We observed correlations between higher risk of rejection with TTR <30% and lower risk of rejection with TTR >75%. Future studies should focus on validating the optimal TTR cutoff while also exploring a cutoff to delineate high-risk patients for which early interventions to improve tacrolimus TTR may be beneficial.
Keywords: heart transplant; tacrolimus; time in therapeutic range.
© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lund LH, Edwards LB, Dipchand AI, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2016;35(10):1158-1169. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.017
-
- Penninga L, Møller CH, Gustafsson F, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression after heart transplantation: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(12):1177-1187. doi:10.1007/s00228-010-0902-6
-
- Costanzo MR, Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, et al. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2010;29(8):914-956. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.034
-
- Baker WL, Steiger S, Martin S, et al. Association between time-in-therapeutic tacrolimus range and early rejection after heart transplant. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther. 2019;39(5):609-613. doi:10.1002/phar.2262
-
- Ensor CR, Iasella CJ, Harrigan KM, et al. Increasing tacrolimus time-in-therapeutic range is associated with superior one-year outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(6):1527-1533. doi:10.1111/ajt.14723
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials