Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 3;21(23):8089.
doi: 10.3390/s21238089.

Does Gait with an Ankle Foot Orthosis Improve or Compromise Minimum Foot Clearance?

Affiliations

Does Gait with an Ankle Foot Orthosis Improve or Compromise Minimum Foot Clearance?

Pedro Fonseca et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate if the use of an ankle foot orthosis in passive mode (without actuation) could modify minimum foot clearance, and if there are any compensatory mechanisms to enable these changes during treadmill gait at a constant speed. Eight participants walked on an instrumented treadmill without and with an ankle foot orthosis on the dominant limb at speeds of 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 km/h. For each gait cycle, the minimum foot clearance and some gait linear kinematic parameters were calculated by an inertial motion capture system. Additionally, maximum hip and knee flexion and maximum ankle plantar flexion were calculated. There were no significant differences in the minimum foot clearance between gait conditions and lower limbs. However, differences were found in the swing, stance and step times between gait conditions, as well as between limbs during gait with orthosis (p < 0.05). An increase in hip flexion during gait with orthosis was observed for all speeds, and different ankle ranges of motion were observed according to speed (p < 0.05). Thus, the use of an ankle foot orthosis in passive mode does not significantly hinder minimum foot clearance, but can change gait linear and angular parameters in non-pathological individuals.

Keywords: compensation; gait analysis; minimum foot clearance; orthosis; rehabilitation; swing phase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and the funding agency had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of the (a) experimental setup with the participant walking on the instrumented treadmill while wearing the inertial motion capture system in the lower limbs, along with the foot ankle orthosis in the right lower limb and (b) inertial sensor placement locations in the participant’s lower limbs.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alcock L., Vanicek N., O’Brien T.D. Alterations in gait speed and age do not fully explain the changes in gait mechanics associated with healthy older women. Gait Posture. 2013;37:586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGrath D., Greene B.R., Walsh C., Caulfield B. Estimation of minimum ground clearance (MGC) using body-worn inertial sensors. J. Biomech. 2011;44:1083–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonifácio D., Richards J., Selfe J., Curran S., Trede R. Influence and benefits of foot orthoses on kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation during step descent task. Gait Posture. 2018;65:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.07.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . World Health Organization Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. WHO Press; Geneva, Switzerland: 2007.
    1. Berg W.P., Alessio H.M., Mills E.M., Tong C. Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 1997;26:261–268. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.4.261. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources