Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5556.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10235556.

The Impact of Recipient Demographics on Outcomes from Living Donor Kidneys: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Recipient Demographics on Outcomes from Living Donor Kidneys: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maria Irene Bellini et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background and Aims: Recipient demographics affect outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess, for kidneys retrieved from living donors, the effect of recipient sex, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) on delayed graft function (DGF) and one-year graft function, incidence of acute rejection (AR), and recipient and graft survivals. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched using algorithms through Ovid. Web of Science collection, BIOSIS, CABI, Korean Journal database, Russian Science Citation Index, and SciELO were searched through Web of Science. Cochrane database was also searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the NHBLI tools. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5.4. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were used in analysis. Results: A total of 5129 studies were identified; 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Female recipients were found to have a significantly lower serum creatinine 1-year-post renal transplantation (MD: -0.24 mg/dL 95%CI: -0.18 to -0.29 p < 0.01) compared to male recipients. No significant difference in survival between male and female recipients nor between Caucasians and Africans was observed (p = 0.08). However, Caucasian recipients had a higher 1-year graft survival compared to African recipients (95% CI 0.52-0.98) with also a lower incidence of DGF (RR = 0.63 p < 0.01) and AR (RR = 0.55 p < 0.01). Recipient obesity (BMI > 30) was found to have no effect on 1-year recipient (p = 0.28) and graft survival (p = 0.93) compared to non-obese recipients although non-obese recipients had a lower rate of DGF (RR = 0.65 p < 0.01) and AR (RR = 0.81 p < 0.01) compared to obese recipients. Conclusions: Gender mismatch between male recipients and female donors has negative impact on graft survival. African ethnicity and obesity do not to influence recipient and graft survival but negatively affect DGF and AR rates.

Keywords: BMI; ethnicity; kidney transplant; living donation; recipient’s demographics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Effect of recipient gender on serum creatinine 1-year post-transplantation. (b) Effect of matching genders between recipient and donor on 1-year post-transplantation serum creatinine. (c) One-year post-transplantation serum creatinine in male renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (d) One-year post-transplantation serum creatinine in female renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (e) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in male renal transplant recipients compared to female recipients. (f) Effect of matching genders of renal donor and recipient on 1-year post-transplantation eGFR. (g) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in male renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (h) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in female renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Effect of recipient gender on serum creatinine 1-year post-transplantation. (b) Effect of matching genders between recipient and donor on 1-year post-transplantation serum creatinine. (c) One-year post-transplantation serum creatinine in male renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (d) One-year post-transplantation serum creatinine in female renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (e) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in male renal transplant recipients compared to female recipients. (f) Effect of matching genders of renal donor and recipient on 1-year post-transplantation eGFR. (g) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in male renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor. (h) One-year post-transplantation eGFR in female renal transplant recipients based on the gender of their donor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Effect of recipient ethnicity on 1-year post-transplantation recipient survival. (b) Effect of recipient ethnicity on the incidence of acute rejection. (c) Effect of recipient ethnicity on the incidence of delayed graft function. (d) Effect of recipient ethnicity on 1-year graft survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Effect of recipient BMI on 1-year post-transplantation recipient survival. (b) Effect of recipient BMI on 1-year post-transplantation graft survival. (c) Effect of recipient BMI on the development of acute rejection. (d) Effect of recipient BMI on the development of delayed graft function.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Effect of recipient BMI on 1-year post-transplantation recipient survival. (b) Effect of recipient BMI on 1-year post-transplantation graft survival. (c) Effect of recipient BMI on the development of acute rejection. (d) Effect of recipient BMI on the development of delayed graft function.

References

    1. Policies and guidance ODT. [(accessed on 18 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.odt.nhs.uk/transplantation/tools-policies-and-guidance/polic...
    1. LaPointe R.D., Hays R., Baliga P., Cohen D.J., Cooper M., Danovitch G.M., Dew M.A., Gordon E.J., Mandelbrot D.A., McGuire S., et al. Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: Recommendations to optimize education, access, and care. American journal of transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:914–922. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellini M.I., Courtney A.E., McCaughan J.A. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Improves Graft and Recipient Survival in Patients with Multiple Kidney Transplants. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2118. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072118. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerr K.F., Morenz E.R., Thiessen-Philbrook H., Coca S.G., Wilson F.P., Reese P.P., Parikh C.R. Quantifying Donor Effects on Transplant Outcomes Using Kidney Pairs from Deceased Donors. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019;14:1781–1787. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03810319. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Redfield R.R., Scalea J.R., Zens T.J., Muth B., Kaufman D.B., Djamali A., Astor B.C., Mohamed M. Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2016;29:81–87. doi: 10.1111/tri.12696. - DOI - PubMed