Augmentative Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Comprehensive Review
- PMID: 34884874
- PMCID: PMC8658307
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms222313070
Augmentative Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is associated with poor outcomes, but a consensus is lacking in the literature regarding which compound represents the best pharmacological augmentation strategy to antidepressants (AD). In the present review, we identify the available literature regarding the pharmacological augmentation to AD in TRD. Research in the main psychiatric databases was performed (PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, PsychInfo). Only original articles in English with the main topic being pharmacological augmentation in TRD and presenting a precise definition of TRD were included. Aripiprazole and lithium were the most investigated molecules, and aripiprazole presented the strongest evidence of efficacy. Moreover, olanzapine, quetiapine, cariprazine, risperidone, and ziprasidone showed positive results but to a lesser extent. Brexpiprazole and intranasal esketamine need further study in real-world practice. Intravenous ketamine presented an evincible AD effect in the short-term. The efficacy of adjunctive ADs, antiepileptic drugs, psychostimulants, pramipexole, ropinirole, acetyl-salicylic acid, metyrapone, reserpine, testosterone, T3/T4, naltrexone, SAMe, and zinc cannot be precisely estimated in light of the limited available data. Studies on lamotrigine and pindolol reported negative results. According to our results, aripiprazole and lithium may be considered by clinicians as potential effective augmentative strategies in TRD, although the data regarding lithium are somewhat controversial. Reliable conclusions about the other molecules cannot be drawn. Further controlled comparative studies, standardized in terms of design, doses, and duration of the augmentative treatments, are needed to formulate definitive conclusions.
Keywords: augmentation; psychopharmacology; review; treatment-resistant depression.
Conflict of interest statement
M.M. served as speaker for Janssen. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHM) Guideline on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Depression. European Medicines Agency; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. EMA/CHMP/185423/2010 Rev. 2 previously (CPMP/EWP/518/97, Rev. 1)
-
- Bauer M., Pfennig A., Severus E., Whybrow P.C., Angst J., Möller H.J., World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, part 1: Update 2013 on the acute and continuation treatment of unipolar depressive disorders. World J. Biol. Psychiatry. 2013;14:334–385. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2013.804195. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
