Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12638.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312638.

Body Composition and Bioelectrical-Impedance-Analysis-Derived Raw Variables in Pole Dancers

Affiliations

Body Composition and Bioelectrical-Impedance-Analysis-Derived Raw Variables in Pole Dancers

Giada Ballarin et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Few data are available on the body composition of pole dancers. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a method that is used to estimate fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM), while raw BIA variables, such as the impedance ratio (IR) and phase angle (PhA), are markers of body cell mass and the ratio between extracellular and total body water. The aim of this study was to evaluate the body composition of pole dancers compared to controls, in particular, those raw BIA variables that are considered as markers of muscle composition. Forty female pole dancers and 59 controls participated in the study. BIA was performed on the whole body and upper and lower limbs, separately, at 5, 50, 100 and 250 kHz. The FFM, FFM index, FM and body fat percentage (BF%) were predicted. The bioelectrical impedance indexes IR and PhA were also considered. Pole dancers exhibited higher FFMI and BI indexes and lower BF%. PhA was greater and IRs were smaller in pole dancers than in controls for the whole body and upper limbs. Considering the training level, FFM, whole-body IR and PhA were higher in the professionals than non-professionals. Raw BIA variables significantly differed between the pole dancers and controls, suggesting a higher BCM; furthermore, practicing pole dancing was associated with a greater FFM and lower FM.

Keywords: bioelectrical impedance analysis; impedance ratio; muscle composition; phase angle; pole dance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Impedance ratio Z 250 kHz/Z 5 kHz and phase angle at 50 kHz in amateur or professional pole dancers compared to control women. * p < 0.05 vs. controls ** p < 0.05 vs. amateurs and controls.

References

    1. Ackland W.P.T.R., Lohman T.G., Sundgot-Borgen J., Maughan R.J., Meyer N.L., Stewart A., Müller W. Current Status of Body Composition Assessment in Sport. Sports Med. 2012;42:227–249. doi: 10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castizo-Olier J., Irurtia A., Jemni M., Carrasco-Marginet M., Fernández-García R., Rodríguez F.A. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) in sport and exercise: Systematic review and future perspectives. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197957. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moon J.R. Body composition in athletes and sports nutrition: An examination of the bioimpedance analysis technique. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013;67:S54–S59. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.165. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sardinha L., Correia I.R., Magalhães J.P., Júdice P., Silva A.M., Hetherington-Rauth M. Development and validation of BIA prediction equations of upper and lower limb lean soft tissue in athletes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020;74:1646–1652. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0666-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kyle U.G., Bosaeus I., De Lorenzo A.D., Deurenberg P., Elia M., Gomez J.M., Heitmann B.L., Kent-Smith L., Melchior J.-C., Pirlich M., et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis? Part I: Review of principles and methods. Clin. Nutr. 2004;23:1226–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004. - DOI - PubMed