Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12726.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312726.

Group Medical Care: A Systematic Review of Health Service Performance

Shayna D Cunningham  1 , Ryan A Sutherland  2 , Chloe W Yee  2 , Jordan L Thomas  3 , Joan K Monin  2 , Jeannette R Ickovics  2 , Jessica B Lewis  4
Affiliations

Group Medical Care: A Systematic Review of Health Service Performance

Shayna D Cunningham et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Group care models, in which patients with similar health conditions receive medical services in a shared appointment, have increasingly been adopted in a variety of health care settings. Applying the Triple Aim framework, we examined the potential of group medical care to optimize health system performance through improved patient experience, better health outcomes, and the reduced cost of health care. A systematic review of English language articles was conducted using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Studies based on data from randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted in the US and analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach to test the effect of group visits versus standard individual care on at least one Triple Aim domain were included. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies focused on pregnancy (n = 9), diabetes (n = 15), and other chronic health conditions (n = 7). Compared with individual care, group visits have the potential to improve patient experience, health outcomes, and costs for a diversity of health conditions. Although findings varied between studies, no adverse effects were associated with group health care delivery in these randomized controlled trials. Group care models may contribute to quality improvements, better health outcomes, and lower costs for select health conditions.

Keywords: chronic disease management; diabetes; group care; pregnancy; triple aim.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart for the selection of studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Parikh M., Rajendran I., D’Amico S., Luo M., Gardiner P. Characteristics and components of medical group visits for chronic health conditions: A systematic scoping review. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2019;25:683–698. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0524. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noffsinger E.B. Running Group Visits in Your Practice. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2009. The drop-in group medical appointment model: A revolutionary access solution for follow-up visits.
    1. Jaber R., Braksmajer A., Trilling J. Group visits for chronic illness care: Models, benefits and challenges. Fam. Pract. Manag. 2006;13:37–40. - PubMed
    1. Ramdas K., Darzi A. Adopting innovations in care delivery—The case of shared medical appointments. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1105–1107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1612803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magriples U. Group prenatal care. In: Lockwood C.J., Chakrabarti A., editors. UpToDate. UpToDate; Waltham, MA, USA: 2021.

Publication types