Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;63(8):1199-1207.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262713. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Using 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry

Affiliations

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Using 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry

Christiane Schuchardt et al. J Nucl Med. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the safety, kinetics, and dosimetry of the 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) small molecules 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in a large cohort of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). Methods: In total, 138 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 y; age range, 46-90 y) with progressive mCRPC and PSMA expression verified by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT underwent PRLT. Fifty-one patients received 6.1 ± 1.0 GBq (range, 3.4-7.6 GBq) of 177Lu-PSMA I&T, and 87 patients received 6.5 ± 1.1 GBq (range, 3.5-9.0 GBq) of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Dosimetry was performed on all patients using an identical protocol. The mean absorbed doses were estimated with OLINDA software (MIRD Scheme). Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, of the National Cancer Institute. Results: The whole-body half-lives were shorter for 177Lu-PSMA I&T (35 h) than for 177Lu-PSMA-617 (42 h). The mean whole-body dose of 177Lu-PSMA-617 was higher than that of 177Lu-PSMA I&T (0.04 vs. 0.03 Gy/GBq, P < 0.00001). Despite the longer half-life of 177Lu-PSMA-617, the renal dose was lower for 177Lu-PSMA-617 than for 177Lu-PSMA I&T (0.77 vs. 0.92 Gy/GBq, P = 0.0015). Both PSMA small molecules demonstrated a comparable dose to the parotid glands (0.5 Gy/GBq, P = 0.27). Among all normal organs, the lacrimal glands exhibited the highest mean absorbed doses, 5.1 and 3.7 Gy/GBq, for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, respectively. All tumor metastases exhibited a higher initial uptake when using 177Lu-PSMA I&T than when using 177Lu-PSMA-617, as well as a shorter tumor half-life (P < 0.00001). The mean absorbed tumor doses were comparable for both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 (5.8 vs. 5.9 Gy/GBq, P = 0.96). All patients tolerated the therapy without any acute adverse effects. After 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, there was a small, statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, and platelet counts that did not need any clinical intervention. No nephrotoxicity was observed after either 177Lu-PSMA I&T or 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT. Conclusion: Both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT demonstrated favorable safety in mCRPC patients. The highest absorbed doses among healthy organs were in the lacrimal and parotid glands-not, however, resulting in any significant clinical sequel. 177Lu-PSMA-617 demonstrated a higher absorbed dose to the whole-body and lacrimal glands but a lower renal dose than did 177Lu-PSMA I&T. The mean absorbed tumor doses were comparable for both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617. There was a large interpatient variability in the dosimetry parameters. Therefore, individual patient-based dosimetry seems favorable for personalized PRLT.

Keywords: 177Lu; 177Lu-PSMA I&T; 177Lu-PSMA-617; PSMA radioligand therapy; dosimetry; prostate-specific membrane antigen; theranostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of Bad Berka dose protocol. ROI = region of interest; VOI = volume of interest.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
PRLT posttherapy scans and SPECT maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) image. (A) Scans after 177Lu-PSMA I&T. (B) Scans after 177Lu-PSMA-617. p.i. = after injection.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Biodistribution and dosimetry results for normal organs in patients treated with different PSMA ligands. (A) Kinetics: median uptakes in percentage administered activity. (B) Median effective half-life in hours. (C) Median residence time in hours. (D) Mean absorbed doses in Gy/GBq.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Kinetics of metastases and comparative results from 96 metastases (bone, lymph node, liver, lung, and other) of patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA I&T and from 179 tumor lesions (bone, lymph node, liver, lung, and other) of patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617. (A) Median kinetics of all types of metastases. (B) Median kinetics of bone metastases. (C) Median kinetics of lymph node metastases. After administration of therapeutic activity, higher initial uptakes and faster washout for 177Lu-PSMA I&T were observed in bone and lymph node lesions. In contrast, curves of 177Lu-PSMA-617 showed initial increase until 3 h after injection. %IA = percentage injected activity.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Comparative dosimetry results of metastases. (A) Median effective half-life. (B) Median residence time. (C) Mean absorbed dose.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Comparison of laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, leukocyte, platelet, and serum creatinine) before therapy, after 2 cycles, and after 2–6 cycles with long-term follow up (FU) (observation period, 3.2–48.5 mo; mean ± SD, 17.4 ± 11.9 mo; median, 13.2 mo) for 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Halabi S, Vogelzang NJ, Kornblith AB, et al. . Pain predicts overall survival in men with metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2544–2549. - PubMed
    1. Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, et al. . [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:825–833. - PubMed
    1. Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, et al. . Long-term follow-up and outcomes of retreatment in an expanded 50-patient single-center phase II prospective trial of 177Lu-PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:857–865. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. . [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources