Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;7(1):145-153.
doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01008-5. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Dormant phages communicate via arbitrium to control exit from lysogeny

Affiliations

Dormant phages communicate via arbitrium to control exit from lysogeny

Nitzan Aframian et al. Nat Microbiol. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Temperate bacterial viruses (phages) can transition between lysis-replicating and killing the host-and lysogeny, that is, existing as dormant prophages while keeping the host viable. Recent research showed that on invading a naïve cell, some phages communicate using a peptide signal, termed arbitrium, to control the decision of entering lysogeny. Whether communication can also serve to regulate exit from lysogeny (known as phage induction) is unclear. Here we show that arbitrium-coding prophages continue to communicate from the lysogenic state by secreting and sensing the arbitrium signal. Signalling represses DNA damage-dependent phage induction, enabling prophages to reduce the induction rate when surrounded by other lysogens. We show that in certain phages, DNA damage and communication converge to regulate the expression of the arbitrium-responsive gene aimX, while in others integration of DNA damage and communication occurs downstream of aimX expression. Additionally, signalling by prophages tilts the decision of nearby infecting phages towards lysogeny. Altogether, we find that phages use small-molecule communication throughout their entire life cycle to sense the abundance of lysogens in the population, thus avoiding lysis when they are likely to encounter established lysogens rather than permissive uninfected hosts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Decisions, decisions….
    Du Toit A. Du Toit A. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Mar;20(3):125. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00677-7. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 34931060 No abstract available.

References

    1. Ptashne, M. Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda Revisited 3rd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2004).
    1. Kourilsky, P. & Knapp, A. Lysogenization by bacteriophage lambda: III. Multiplicity dependent phenomena occurring upon infection by lambda. Biochimie 56, 1517–1523 (1974). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nanda, A. M., Thormann, K. & Frunzke, J. Impact of spontaneous prophage induction on the fitness of bacterial populations and host-microbe interactions. J. Bacteriol. 197, 410–419 (2015). - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Węgrzyn, G. & Węgrzyn, A. Genetic switches during bacteriophage λ development. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 79, 1–48 (2005). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erez, Z. et al. Communication between viruses guides lysis–lysogeny decisions. Nature 541, 488–493 (2017). - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources