Heart failure with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction across health care settings: an observational study
- PMID: 34889076
- PMCID: PMC8787985
- DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13742
Heart failure with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction across health care settings: an observational study
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to assess the sex-specific distribution of heart failure (HF) with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction across three health care settings.
Methods and results: In this descriptive observational study, we retrieved the distribution of HF types [with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] for men and women between 65 and 79 years of age in three health care settings from a single country: (i) patients with screening-detected HF in the high-risk community (i.e. those with shortness of breath, frailty, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) from four screening studies, (ii) patients with confirmed HF from primary care derived from a single observational study, and (iii) patients with confirmed HF from outpatient cardiology clinics participating in a registry. Among 1407 patients from the high-risk community, 288 had screen-detected HF (15% HFrEF, 12% HFmrEF, 74% HFpEF), and 51% of the screen-detected HF patients were women. In both women (82%) and men (65%), HFpEF was the most prevalent HF type. In the routine general practice population (30 practices, 70 000 individuals), among the 160 confirmed HF cases, 35% had HFrEF, 23% HFmrEF, and 43% HFpEF, and in total, 43% were women. In women, HFpEF was the most prevalent HF type (52%), while in men, this was HFrEF (41%). In outpatient cardiology clinics (n = 34), of the 4742 HF patients (66% HFrEF, 15% HFmrEF, 20% HFpEF), 36% were women. In both women (56%) and men (71%), HFrEF was the most prevalent HF type.
Conclusions: Both HF types and sex distribution vary considerably in HF patients of 65-79 years of age among health care settings. From the high-risk community through to general practice to the cardiology outpatient setting, there is a shift in HF type from HFpEF to HFrEF and a decrease in the proportion of HF patients that are women.
Keywords: HFmrEF; HFrEF; Heart failure; Screening; Sex differences.
© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
H.B.R.L.R. reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Vifor, grants and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. J.B. reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, outside the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Dunlay SH, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14: 591–602. - PubMed
-
- Jaarsma T, Tan B, Bos RJ, van Veldhuisen DJ. Heart failure clinics in the Netherlands in 2003. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004; 3: 271–274. - PubMed
-
- Liljeroos M, Stromberg A. Introducing nurse‐led HF clinics in Swedish primary care settings. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 103–109. - PubMed
-
- Van Spall HGC, Rahman T, Mytton O, Ramasundarahettige C, Ibrahim Q, Kabali C, Coppens M, Brian Haynes R, Connolly S. Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2017; 19: 1427–1443. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
