Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1182/hematology.2021000230.

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where

Affiliations
Case Reports

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where

Andrew J Yee et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. .

Abstract

Improvements in multiple myeloma therapy have led to deeper responses that are beyond the limit of detection by historical immunohistochemistry and conventional flow cytometry in bone marrow samples. In parallel, more sensitive techniques for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) through next-generation flow cytometry and sequencing have been developed and are now routinely available. Deep responses when measured by these assays correspond with improved outcomes and survival. We review the data supporting MRD testing as well as its limitations and how it may fit in with current and future clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andrew J. Yee has consulted for Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda and has received clinical trial support from Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, and Takeda.

Noopur Raje has consulted for Amgen, BMS, Bluebird, GSK, Janssen, and Karyopharm; served on scientific advisory board for Caribou and Immuneel; and received research funding from Bluebird.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Progression-free survival according to MRD level at the start of maintenance in IFM 2009. Progression-free survival improves with each log reduction in MRD in IFM 2009 in patients who achieved at least a very good partial response. Figure adapted from Perrot et al.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Examples of trials evaluating MRD to guide treatment. Treatment decisions with MRD may be broadly divided into 2 categories: (A) following initial therapy to guide treatment intensification or consolidation in patients with MRD positive disease or (B) in patients on maintenance therapy, to guide discontinuation of treatment. Some trials are also examining “early” initiation of therapy with the appearance of MRD-positive disease. D, dexamethasone; isa, isatuximab; K, carfilzomib; maint, maintenance; PD, progressive disease; PREDATOR, Pre-emptive Daratumumab Therapy of Minimal Residual Disease Reappearance or Biochemical Relapse in Multiple Myeloma; R, lenalidomide; RADAR, Risk-Adapted Therapy Directed According to Response; REMNANT, Relapse from MRD Negativity as Indication for Treatment; V, bortezomib.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Examples of trials evaluating MRD to guide treatment. Treatment decisions with MRD may be broadly divided into 2 categories: (A) following initial therapy to guide treatment intensification or consolidation in patients with MRD positive disease or (B) in patients on maintenance therapy, to guide discontinuation of treatment. Some trials are also examining “early” initiation of therapy with the appearance of MRD-positive disease. D, dexamethasone; isa, isatuximab; K, carfilzomib; maint, maintenance; PD, progressive disease; PREDATOR, Pre-emptive Daratumumab Therapy of Minimal Residual Disease Reappearance or Biochemical Relapse in Multiple Myeloma; R, lenalidomide; RADAR, Risk-Adapted Therapy Directed According to Response; REMNANT, Relapse from MRD Negativity as Indication for Treatment; V, bortezomib.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, et al; Bologna 2002 study. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005;106(1):35-39. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-02-0522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landgren O, Hultcrantz M, Diamond B, et al.. Safety and effectiveness of weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the MANHATTAN nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(6):862-868. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0611. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van de Velde HJ, Liu X, Chen G, Cakana A, Deraedt W, Bayssas M. Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007;92(10):1399-1406. doi:10.3324/haematol.11534. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van de Velde H, Londhe A, Ataman O, et al.. Association between complete response and outcomes in transplant-eligible myeloma patients in the era of novel agents. Eur J Haematol. 2017;98(3):269-279. doi:10.1111/ejh.12829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, Mateos M-V, et al; Grupo Español de MM; Programa para el Estudio de la Terapé utica en Hemopatía Maligna. Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011;118(3):529-534. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-332320. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances