Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 8;23(12):e26002.
doi: 10.2196/26002.

Culture-Specific Observations in a Saudi Arabian Digital Home Health Care Program: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Their Caregivers

Abdulaziz A Alodhayani  1 , Marwah Mazen Hassounah  1 , Fatima R Qadri  2   3 , Noura A Abouammoh  1 , Zakiuddin Ahmed  2   4 , Abdullah M Aldahmash  5   6
Affiliations

Culture-Specific Observations in a Saudi Arabian Digital Home Health Care Program: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Their Caregivers

Abdulaziz A Alodhayani et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence of the need to consider cultural factors in the design and implementation of digital health interventions. However, there is still inadequate knowledge pertaining to the aspects of the Saudi Arabian culture that need to be considered in the design and implementation of digital health programs, especially in the context of home health care services for patients who are chronically and terminally ill.

Objective: This study aims to explore the specific cultural factors related to patients and their caregivers from the perspective of physicians, nurses, and trainers that have influenced the pilot implementation of Remotely Accessible Healthcare At Home, a connected health program in the Home Health Care department at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A qualitative study design was adopted to conduct a focus group discussion in July 2019 using a semistructured interview guide with 3 female and 4 male participants working as nurses, family physicians, and information technologists. Qualitative data obtained were analyzed using a thematic framework analysis.

Results: A total of 2 categories emerged from the focus group discussion that influenced the experiences of digital health program intervention: first, culture-related factors including language and communication, cultural views on using cameras during consultation, nonadherence to web-based consultations, and family role and commitment and second, caregiver characteristics in telemedicine that includes their skills and education and electronic literacy. Participants of this study revealed that indirect contact with patients and their family members may work as a barrier to proper communication through the Remotely Accessible Healthcare At Home program.

Conclusions: We recommend exploring the use of interpreters in digital health, creating awareness among the local population regarding privacy in digital health, and actively involving direct family members with the health care providers.

Keywords: Arab; Islam; connected health; culture; digital health; mobile phone; telehealth; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different departments piloted by Remotely Accessible Healthcare At Home program including the Home Health Care department. RAHAH: Remotely Accessible Healthcare At Home.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathway of health communication using telemedicine in Remotely Accessible Healthcare At Home program in the Home Health Care department.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chu L, Shah AG, Rouholiman D, Riggare S, Gamble JG. Patient-centric strategies in digital health. In: Rivas H, Wac K, editors. Digital Health. Health Informatics. Cham: Springer; 2018. Jan 03,
    1. Voran D. Telemedicine and beyond. Mo Med. 2015;112(2):129–35. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25958658 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vegesna A, Tran M, Angelaccio M, Arcona S. Remote patient monitoring via non-invasive digital technologies: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2017 Jan;23(1):3–17. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0051. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27116181 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agboola S, Kvedar J. Telemedicine and patient safety. AHRQ Patient Safety Network. 2016. [2021-11-18]. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/telemedicine-and-patient-safety .
    1. Di Cerbo A, Morales-Medina JC, Palmieri B, Iannitti T. Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:65–75. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S61617. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S61617.ppa-9-065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed