Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 8;23(12):e31121.
doi: 10.2196/31121.

An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study

Affiliations

An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study

Clara Lajonchere et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Obtaining explicit consent from patients to use their remnant biological samples and deidentified clinical data for research is essential for advancing precision medicine.

Objective: We aimed to describe the operational implementation and scalability of an electronic universal consent process that was used to power an institutional precision health biobank across a large academic health system.

Methods: The University of California, Los Angeles, implemented the use of innovative electronic consent videos as the primary recruitment tool for precision health research. The consent videos targeted patients aged ≥18 years across ambulatory clinical laboratories, perioperative settings, and hospital settings. Each of these major areas had slightly different workflows and patient populations. Sociodemographic information, comorbidity data, health utilization data (ambulatory visits, emergency room visits, and hospital admissions), and consent decision data were collected.

Results: The consenting approach proved scalable across 22 clinical sites (hospital and ambulatory settings). Over 40,000 participants completed the consent process at a rate of 800 to 1000 patients per week over a 2-year time period. Participants were representative of the adult University of California, Los Angeles, Health population. The opt-in rates in the perioperative (16,500/22,519, 73.3%) and ambulatory clinics (2308/3390, 68.1%) were higher than those in clinical laboratories (7506/14,235, 52.7%; P<.001). Patients with higher medical acuity were more likely to opt in. The multivariate analyses showed that African American (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58; P<.001), Asian (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.77; P<.001), and multiple-race populations (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77; P<.001) were less likely to participate than White individuals.

Conclusions: This is one of the few large-scale, electronic video-based consent implementation programs that reports a 65.5% (26,314/40,144) average overall opt-in rate across a large academic health system. This rate is higher than those previously reported for email (3.6%) and electronic biobank (50%) informed consent rates. This study demonstrates a scalable recruitment approach for population health research.

Keywords: biobanking; clinical data; consent; data collection; eHealth; electronic consent; patient privacy; population health; precision medicine; privacy; recruitment; research; research methods; scalability; validation; video.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative screenshots of universal consent animated videos. Tsp: teaspoon.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Universal consent workflow. EHR: electronic health record.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ginsburg GS, Phillips KA. Precision medicine: From science to value. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018 May;37(5):694–701. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1624. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29733705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrini C. "Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):217–220. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.004.S0277-9536(09)00666-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greely HT. Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information. Wake Forest Law Rev. 1999;34(3):737–766. - PubMed
    1. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects ('Common Rule') U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections. [2020-10-29]. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/... .
    1. NIH genomic data sharing policy. National Institutes of Health. [2020-10-29]. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-124.html .

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources