Detection of Significant Hyperopia in Preschool Children Using Two Automated Vision Screeners
- PMID: 34889862
- PMCID: PMC8816853
- DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001837
Detection of Significant Hyperopia in Preschool Children Using Two Automated Vision Screeners
Abstract
Significance: Moderate to high uncorrected hyperopia in preschool children is associated with amblyopia, strabismus, reduced visual function, and reduced literacy. Detecting significant hyperopia during screening is important to allow children to be followed for development of amblyopia or strabismus and implementation of any needed ophthalmic or educational interventions.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of two automated screening devices to identify preschool children with moderate to high hyperopia.
Methods: Children in the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) study were screened with the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, Inc., Melville, NY) and Plusoptix Power Refractor II (Plusoptix, Nuremberg, Germany) and examined by masked eye care professionals to detect the targeted conditions of amblyopia, strabismus, or significant refractive error, and reduced visual acuity. Significant hyperopia (American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus definition of hyperopia as an amblyopia risk factor), based on cycloplegic retinoscopy, was >4.00 D for age 36 to 48 months and >3.50 D for age older than 48 months. Referral criteria from VIP for each device and from a distributor (PediaVision) for the Power Refractor II were applied to screening results.
Results: Among 1430 children, 132 children had significant hyperopia in at least one eye. Using the VIP referral criteria, sensitivities for significant hyperopia were 80.3% for the Retinomax and 69.7% for the Power Refractor II (difference, 10.6%; 95% confidence interval, 7.0 to 20.5%; P = .04); specificities relative to any targeted condition were 89.9 and 89.1%, respectively. Using the PediaVision referral criteria for the Power Refractor, sensitivity for significant hyperopia was 84.9%; however, specificity relative to any targeted condition was 78.3%, 11.6% lower than the specificity for the Retinomax. Analyses using the VIP definition of significant hyperopia yielded results similar to when the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus definition was used.
Discussion: When implementing vision screening programs for preschool children, the potential for automated devices that use eccentric photorefraction to either miss detecting significant hyperopia or increase false-positive referrals must be taken into consideration.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Optometry.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the author have reported a financial conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, et al. Guidelines for Automated Preschool Vision Screening: A 10-Year, Evidence-Based Update. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;17:4–8. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Preferred Practice Panel. Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2017. Available at: https://www.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/pediatric-eye-evaluations.... Accessed September 16, 2020.
-
- Shankar S, Evans MA, Bobier WR. Hyperopia and Emergent Literacy of Young Children: Pilot Study. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:1031–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical