Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;39(5):e14766.
doi: 10.1111/dme.14766. Epub 2021 Dec 26.

International comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes: an update and extension

Affiliations

International comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes: an update and extension

Regina Prigge et al. Diabet Med. 2022 May.

Abstract

Aims: To update and extend a previous cross-sectional international comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Data were obtained for 520,392 children and adults with type 1 diabetes from 17 population and five clinic-based data sources in countries or regions between 2016 and 2020. Median HbA1c (IQR) and proportions of individuals with HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%), 58-74 mmol/mol (7.5-8.9%) and ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) were compared between populations for individuals aged <15, 15-24 and ≥25 years. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) relative to ≥58 mmol/mol (≥7.5%), stratified and adjusted for sex, age and data source. Where possible, changes in the proportion of individuals in each HbA1c category compared to previous estimates were calculated.

Results: Median HbA1c varied from 55 to 79 mmol/mol (7.2 to 9.4%) across data sources and age groups so a pooled estimate was deemed inappropriate. OR (95% CI) for HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) were 0.91 (0.90-0.92) for women compared to men, 1.68 (1.65-1.71) for people aged <15 years and 0.81 (0.79-0.82) aged15-24 years compared to those aged ≥25 years. Differences between populations persisted after adjusting for sex, age and data source. In general, compared to our previous analysis, the proportion of people with an HbA1c < 58 mmol/l (<7.5%) increased and proportions of people with HbA1c ≥ 75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) decreased.

Conclusions: Glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes continues to vary substantially between age groups and data sources. While some improvement over time has been observed, glycaemic control remains sub-optimal for most people with Type 1 diabetes.

Keywords: HbA1c; glycaemic control; registers of people with diabetes; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:9-16.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S11-S66.
    1. IDF/ISPAD. 2011 Global Guideline for Diabetes in Childhood and Adolescence. 2013.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of Diabetes: A National Clinical Guideline. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2017. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign116.pdf
    1. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43:S66-S76.

LinkOut - more resources