Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification
- PMID: 34892971
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00008.x
Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification
Abstract
So-called DNA barcodes have recently been proposed to answer the problem of specimen identification and to quantify global biodiversity. We show that this proposition is wanting in terms of rationale, methodology and interpretation of results. In addition to falling short of all its stated goals, the method abandons the benefits of morphological studies in favor of a limited molecular identification system that would ultimately impede our understanding of biodiversity.
References
-
- Avise, J.C., 2000. Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Harvard University press, Cambridge, MA.
-
- Estabrook, G.F., 1978. Some concepts for the estimation of evolutionary relationships in systematic botany. Syst. Bot. 3, 146-158.
-
- Estabrook, G.F., 1986. Evolutionary classification using convex phenetics. Syst. Zool. 35, 560-570.
-
- Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., DeWaard, J.R., 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 270, 313-321.
-
- Hebert, P.D.N., Ratnasingham, S. and DeWaard, J.R., 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Suppl. 270, S96-S99.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources