Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):23795.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03183-1.

Trends in neonatal intensive care unit admissions by race/ethnicity in the United States, 2008-2018

Affiliations

Trends in neonatal intensive care unit admissions by race/ethnicity in the United States, 2008-2018

Youngran Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

To examine temporal trends of NICU admissions in the U.S. by race/ethnicity, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using natality files provided by the National Center for Health Statistics at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A total of 38,011,843 births in 2008-2018 were included. Crude and risk-adjusted NICU admission rates, overall and stratified by birth weight group, were compared between white, black, and Hispanic infants. Crude NICU admission rates increased from 6.62% (95% CI 6.59-6.65) to 9.07% (95% CI 9.04-9.10) between 2008 and 2018. The largest percentage increase was observed among Hispanic infants (51.4%) compared to white (29.1%) and black (32.4%) infants. Overall risk-adjusted rates differed little by race/ethnicity, but birth weight-stratified analysis revealed that racial/ethnic differences diminished in the very low birth weight (< 1500 g) and moderately low birth weight (1500-2499 g) groups. Overall NICU admission rates increased by 37% from 2008 to 2018, and the increasing trends were observed among all racial and ethnic groups. Diminished racial/ethnic differences in NICU admission rates in very low birth weight infants may reflect improved access to timely appropriate NICU care among high-risk infants through increasing health care coverage coupled with growing NICU supply.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort derivation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Temporal trends for crude NICU admission rates by race/ethnicity for 2008–2018 all births and subgroups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
NICU admission across birth weight by race/ethnicity, 2008 vs 2018.

References

    1. Philip AG. The evolution of neonatology. Pediatr. Res. 2005;58:799–815. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000151693.46655.66. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130:587–597. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1999. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson DK, Reed K, Cutler JC, et al. Perinatal regionalization versus hospital competition: The Hartford example. Pediatrics. 1995;96:417–423. - PubMed
    1. Gagnon D, Allison-Cooke S, Schwartz RM. Perinatal care: The threat of deregionalization. Pediatr. Ann. 1988;17:447–452. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19880701-06. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gould JB, Marks AR, Chavez G. Expansion of community-based perinatal care in California. J. Perinatol. 2002;22:630–640. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210824. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms