Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;150(7):1174-1183.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.33893. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Impact of specific high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes on survival in oropharyngeal cancer

Affiliations

Impact of specific high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes on survival in oropharyngeal cancer

Martin Garset-Zamani et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

The increases observed in incidence and survival of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have been attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, but the survival-impact of specific genotypes is poorly understood. We investigated the potential influence of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV-positive (HPV+) OPSCC. All patients with HPV+/p16+ OPSCC and available genotype data within the period 2011 to 2017 in Eastern Denmark were included. Descriptive statistics on clinical and tumor data, as well as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with Cox hazard models and Kaplan-Meier plots were performed. Overall, 769 HPV+/p16+ OPSCC patients were included of which genotype HPV16 accounted for 86% (n = 662). Compared to high-risk non-HPV16 genotypes (HR non-HPV16), HPV16 patients were younger at diagnosis (median years, 60 vs 64), had a higher male to female ratio (3.7:1 vs 2.1:1), and lower performance scores of ≤1 (90%, n = 559, vs 81%, n = 74). Regarding 5-year OS and RFS, no difference was observed between HPV16 and HR non-HPV16 patients. Subgrouping the HR non-HPV16 group into HPV33 (n = 57), HPV35 (n = 26) and "other genotypes" (n = 24) a significantly worse OS in the "other genotypes" group (hazard rate: 2.33, P = .027) was shown. With similar survival results between HPV16 and non-HPV16 genotypes, genotyping in OPSCC is interesting from an epidemiological point of view as well as in vaccination programs, but not a necessary addition in prognostication of HPV+/p16+ OPSCC.

Keywords: HPV genotype; head and neck cancer; human papillomavirus; oropharyngeal cancer; oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, et al. A review of human carcinogens-part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:321-322.
    1. Taberna M, Mena M, Pavón MA, Alemany L, Gillison ML, Mesía R. Human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2386-2398.
    1. Haeggblom L, Attoff T, Jingru Y, et al. Changes in incidence and prevalence of human papillomavirus in tonsillar and base of tongue cancer during 2000-2016 in the Stockholm region and Sweden. Head Neck. 2018;41:1-8.
    1. Zamani M, Grønhøj C, Jensen DH, et al. The current epidemic of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: an 18-year Danish population-based study with 2,169 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2020;134:52-59.
    1. Stjernstrøm KD, Jensen JS, Jakobsen KK, Grønhøj C, von Buchwald C. Current status of human papillomavirus positivity in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in Europe: a systematic review. Viruses. 2019;139:1112-1116.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources