Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 11;17(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00301-2.

Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol

Affiliations

Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol

Heinz Winsauer et al. Head Face Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Bone-borne miniscrew assisted palatal expansion (MAPE) is a common technique to improve maxillary transverse deficiency in young adolescents. Adult patients usually present a challenge, as they often require additional surgical assisted maxillary expansion (SARPE). There is still no clear statement about non-surgical expansion in adult patients using this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rate of non-surgical palatal expansion in adults utilizing MAPE with a novel force-controlled polycyclic expansion protocol (FCPC).

Methods: This consecutive study consisted of 33 adult patients with an average age of 29.1 ± 10.2 years (min. 18 years, max. 58 years), including one dropout patient. First, four miniscrews were inserted and after 12-weeks latency, the expander was placed and the FCPC protocol was applied (MAPE group). In case of missing expansion, a SARPE was performed (SARPE group). After maximum expansion, a cone beam CT was made and widening of the midpalatal suture was measured. The outcome variables were successful non-surgical expansion and, with sample size power above 80%, the odds of failed non-surgical expansion and associated complications were evaluated. The primary predictor variable was age. Statistical analysis was performed using R (Version 3.1) to calculate power, to construct various models for measuring the odds of requiring surgical intervention/complications, and others.

Results: Successful non-surgical expansion was achieved in 27 patients (84.4%), ranging from 18 to 49 years. Mean age differed significantly between both groups (26.8 ± 8.2 years vs. 41.3 ± 9.9 years; p < 0.001). Mean expansion at the anterior and posterior palate for the MAPE group was 5.4 ± 1.5 mm and 2.5 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. Among these subjects' complications were observed in 18.5%. Age significantly increased the odds of complications (p = 0.019).

Conclusions: 1. The success rate of MAPE among individuals aged 18 to 49 years was 84.4%. 2. A V-shaped expansion pattern in the antero-posterior dimension was mostly observed. 3. Complications were significantly associated with age. 4. A careful expansion protocol seems to be beneficial to prevent unfavorable results in adult patients.

Trial registration: Consecutive cohort study, Review Board No. EK-2-2014/0016.

Keywords: Adult patients; Bone-borne; Complication; MAPE; MARPE; Maxillary expansion; Miniscrew; Non-surgical; Success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a-k Example of maxillary expansion with a MICRO-4 device in a 33.8 y a M4 and M5 positions for the orthodontic miniscrews b After placement, both screws on each side were connected with alastic chains. c This serves as a bridge to cover the screw heads with light curing resin to assure stability during 3 months of osseo-integration d MICRO-4 device with small hex nut e Initial occlusal x-ray f After reaching maximum opening of the jackscrew, the MICRO4 expander was removed and the small hex nut exchanged against a wider one g The same device was reinserted to continue the expansion procedure without the need of appliance reconstruction (in this case the right M5 orthodontic miniscrew needed to be relocated and the expander slightly adapted) h Final occlusal x-ray after expansion stop i Two year retention with bone-borne TPA. The orthodontic miniscrews in position M5 removed after insertion of TPA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Force-controlled polycyclic expansion protocol (FCPC): force control by measuring the applied force at the end of the activating wrench. This is done by the patient twice a day with less than 500 cN turning power allowed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Measurements on CBCT after maximum of non-surgical expansion at the anterior and posterior palate. The nasopalatine foramen (white bracket) and the greater palatine foramina on both sides (white line) were references for measurements
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Minor deformation of mini screw as seen in 4 patients in the present study

References

    1. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Üçem TT. Comparison of dental arch and arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:255–61. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.255. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber AF, Sims MR. Rapid maxillary expansion and external root resorption in man: a scanning electron microscope study. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:630–52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90356-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holberg C, Rudzki-Janson I. Stresses at the cranial base induced by rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2006 doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0543:SATCBI]2.0.CO;2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mommaerts MY. Transpalatal distraction as a method of maxillary expansion. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:268–72. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verlinden CRA, Gooris PG, Becking AG. Complications in transpalatal distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:899–905. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.026. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources