Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May:82:165-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.061. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Promotes the Healing of Non-Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Promotes the Healing of Non-Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. A Randomized Controlled Trial

El Mahdy Hossam et al. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: DFU (diabetic foot ulcer) represents a major global health and socioeconomic problem and a leading cause of lower limb amputation. Although many therapies have been tested, none has been proposed as a dominant wound healing treatment. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study in order to assess the role of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) for the promotion of non-ischemic DFU healing.

Methods: After full vascular assessment, a total of 80 patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either PRP injection in the healing edge and the floor of the targeted DFU (Group A), or have usual standard care with moist dressing with or without collagenase ointment (Group B). We calculated the total surface area (TSA) for the ulcer in both groups (cm2) before, after treatment and every week up to 12 weeks of follow-up.

Results: A total of 4 patients (10%) experienced major amputation in group B, while no major amputation was performed in patients of Group A (P< 0.001). A ≥ 50% reduction in TSA occurred earlier in Group A (at 2.5 weeks), compared to Group B (4.5 weeks); P < 0.001. Complete wound healing rate was 95% (n = 38) and it was achieved earlier (6th week) for patients of group A, contrary to 77.8% (n = 28) of patients (9th week) for Group B (P < 0.001). Superficial wound infection was noted in 10% (n = 4) of the cases in the PRP arm, while in group B, 45% (n = 18) of cases had a variable degree of infection ranging from superficial to deep wound infection and cellulites (P < 0.001). PRP treatment was cost-effective, with 247.50$ vs. 437.50$ for the total cost of treatment for patients of Group B.

Conclusion: PRP is a cost-beneficial novel modality of treatment that can accelerate wound healing and decrease the rate of local infection in DFU, compared to other conventional treatment modalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types