Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;45(S2):16-25.
doi: 10.1002/jpen.2287.

Nutrition challenges of cancer cachexia

Affiliations
Review

Nutrition challenges of cancer cachexia

Omnia U Gaafer et al. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Cancer cachexia, or progressive weight loss, often despite adequate nutrition contributes greatly to cancer morbidity and mortality. Cachexia is metabolically distinct from starvation or protein malnutrition, although many patients with cancer and cachexia exhibit lowered appetite and food consumption. Tumors affect neural mechanisms that regulate appetite and energy expenditure, while promoting wasting of peripheral tissues via catabolism of cardiac and skeletal muscle, adipose, and bone. These multimodal actions of tumors on the host suggest a need for multimodal interventions. However, multiple recent consensus guidelines for management of cancer cachexia differ in treatment recommendations, highlighting the lack of effective, available therapies. Challenges to defining appropriate nutrition or other interventions for cancer cachexia include lack of consensus on definitions, low strength of evidence from clinical trials, and a scarcity of robust, rigorous, and mechanistic studies. However, efforts to diagnose, stage, and monitor cachexia are increasing along with clinical trial activity. Furthermore, preclinical models for cancer cachexia are growing more sophisticated, encompassing a greater number of tumor types in organ-appropriate contexts and for metastatic disease to model the clinical condition more accurately. It is expected that continued growth, investment, and coordination of research in this topic will ultimately yield robust biomarkers, clinically useful classification and staging algorithms, targetable pathways, pivotal clinical trials, and ultimately, cures. Here, we provide an overview of the clinical and scientific knowledge and its limitations around cancer cachexia.

Keywords: animal models; anorexia; appetite; cachexia; cancer; malnutrition; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure:
Figure:. Growth in cancer cachexia research.
Primary publications by year returned when searching for “cancer” (left axis) versus “cancer cachexia” (right axis) in PubMed, accessed August 2021.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. von Haehling S, Anker SD. Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers—update 2014. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2014/December// 2014;5(4):261–263. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. The Lancet Oncology. 2011/May/01/ 2011;12(5):489–495. - PubMed
    1. Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB, Nishijima TF. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 2016/April// 2016;57:58–67. - PubMed
    1. Gannavarapu BS, Lau SKM, Carter K, et al. Prevalence and Survival Impact of Pretreatment Cancer-Associated Weight Loss: A Tool for Guiding Early Palliative Care. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2018/April/01/ 2018;14(4):e238–e250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Oates J, Cunningham D. Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 1998/March// 1998;34(4):503–509. - PubMed

Publication types