Use of a motion-based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
- PMID: 34897780
- PMCID: PMC9300000
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.24854
Use of a motion-based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
Abstract
Aims: There is limited data addressing the value of vaginal biofeedback (VBF) on fecal incontinence (FI) symptoms. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate whether use of a motion-based VBF device and app was effective for at-home treatment of women with FI. We hypothesized that VBF would result in improvement in FI symptoms.
Methods: A single-arm 10-week prospective pilot trial in women with FI was conducted using the VBF device. The primary outcome was change in St. Mark's score from baseline to week 10. Secondary outcomes included change in 2-week bowel diary and FI quality of life (FIQoL). Statistical analysis included paired t test and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.
Results: Of 29 enrolled women, 27 had data available for analysis. Mean (±SD) age was 60.9 (±14.4). 63% (17) subjects were White, 33% (9) were Black. Mean St. Mark's score was 14.6 (±4.4) at baseline and 11.6 (±5.1) at 10-weeks (p = 0.005). Changes in the total FIQol, and three of four subsets of the FIQoL scores were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). Bowel diary showed decrease in FI episodes, baseline 8.4 (±8.73) to 10 weeks 4.8 (±3.79), (p = 0.052).
Conclusions: In this pilot study, there was significant improvement in FI symptom-specific severity and quality of life using a vaginal, motion-based device for biofeedback. A larger study is needed to better understand the value of this device, which may be useful for women who prefer a vaginal device, which can be utilized at home compared with standard anal biofeedback for treatment of FI in the clinical setting.
Keywords: biofeedback; digital health; fecal incontinence; female; pelvic floor.
© 2021 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Milena M. Weinstein, Royalties from UptoDate, Samantha J. Pulliam, employee of Renovia Inc.; Laura Keyser, employee of Renovia, Inc. The remaining author declares no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Correlation Between Mobile-Application Electronic Bowel Diary and Validated Questionnaires in Women with Fecal Incontinence.Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Mar;35(3):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05711-1. Epub 2024 Jan 11. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. PMID: 38206340 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A 12-Month Clinical Durability of Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of a Vaginal Bowel Control System for the Nonsurgical Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):113-119. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000681. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30807411 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A preliminary evaluation of the TOPAS system for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):155-62. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000080. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014. PMID: 24763157
-
Prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in adults.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Dec;(161):1-379. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 18457475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The SECCA procedure: a new therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence.Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:107-10. Surg Technol Int. 2004. PMID: 15744681 Review.
References
-
- Bharucha AE, Dunivan G, Goode PS, et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):127‐136. 10.1038/ajg.2014.396 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources