Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;21(3):490-507.
doi: 10.1177/14680181211008340. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

Confronted with COVID-19: Migrant live-in care during the pandemic

Affiliations

Confronted with COVID-19: Migrant live-in care during the pandemic

Michael Leiblfinger et al. Glob Soc Policy. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

In the spring 2020, measures introduced across Europe to limit the spread of COVID-19 included, among others, the temporary closure of borders. For Romanian and Slovakian live-in carers, this meant they were no longer able to commute between the Austrian households they work in and their respective countries of origin. Due to the relatively short cyclical rotas of 2-4 weeks, travel restrictions heavily affected cross-border live-in care between the three countries, which makes them a particular case for studying the effects of pandemic-related measures on transnational care arrangements. Drawing on media reports, relevant laws and policies, and interviews with representatives of care workers' interests, the article examines how live-in care as a whole and care workers in particular were affected by the pandemic and related policy responses such as specific travel arrangements and financial incentives for workers. It shows that while live-in carers were deemed critical workers and essential for the long-term care system, the inequalities and dependencies already existing in transnational care arrangements were deepened. Care workers' wants, needs and interests were subordinated to the interests of care recipients, agencies and sending and receiving countries.

Keywords: Critical workers; cross-border care circulation; long-term care; migrant live-in care; pandemic policies; pandemic response; transnational care arrangements.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson B. (2000) Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: Zed Books.
    1. Anderson B, Shutes I. (eds) (2014) Migration and Care Labour: Theory, Policy and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    1. Aulenbacher B, Leiblfinger M, Prieler V. (2020) The promise of decent care and the problem of poor working conditions: Double movements around live-in care in Austria. Socialpolicy.ch – Journal of the Division of Sociology, Social Policy, Social Work 2: 2.5.
    1. Aulenbacher B, Leiblfinger M, Prieler V. (2021) Das umstrittene Selbstständigenmodell: Live-in-Betreuung in Österreich. In: Aulenbacher B, Lutz H, Schwiter K. (eds) Gute Sorge ohne gute Arbeit? Live-in-Care in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Weinheim; Basel: Beltz Juventa, pp. 66–78.
    1. Bahna M. (2014) Slovak care workers in Austria: How important is the context of the sending country? Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22(4): 411–426.

LinkOut - more resources