Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 24:12:752347.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.752347. eCollection 2021.

Differential Autophagy Response in Men and Women After Muscle Damage

Affiliations

Differential Autophagy Response in Men and Women After Muscle Damage

Hui-Ying Luk et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Following muscle damage, autophagy is crucial for muscle regeneration. Hormones (e.g., testosterone, cortisol) regulate this process and sex differences in autophagic flux exist in the basal state. However, to date, no study has examined the effect of a transient hormonal response following eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage (EE) between untrained young men and women. Untrained men (n = 8, 22 ± 3 years) and women (n = 8, 19 ± 1 year) completed two sessions of 80 unilateral maximal eccentric knee extensions followed by either upper body resistance exercise (RE; designed to induce a hormonal response; EE + RE) or a time-matched rest period (20 min; EE + REST). Vastus lateralis biopsy samples were collected before (BL), and 12 h, and 24 h after RE/REST. Gene and protein expression levels of selective markers for autophagic initiation signaling, phagophore initiation, and elongation/sequestration were determined. Basal markers of autophagy were not different between sexes. For EE + RE, although initiation signaling (FOXO3) and autophagy-promoting (BECN1) genes were greater (p < 0.0001; 12.4-fold, p = 0.0010; 10.5-fold, respectively) for women than men, autophagic flux (LC3-II/LC3-I protein ratio) did not change for women and was lower (p < 0.0001 3.0-fold) than men. Furthermore, regardless of hormonal changes, LC3-I and LC3-II protein content decreased (p = 0.0090; 0.547-fold, p = 0.0410; 0.307-fold, respectively) for men suggesting increased LC3-I lipidation and autophagosome degradation whereas LC3-I protein content increased (p = 0.0360; 1.485-fold) for women suggesting decreased LC3-I lipidation. Collectively, our findings demonstrated basal autophagy was not different between men and women, did not change after EE alone, and was promoted with the acute hormonal increase after RE only in men but not in women. Thus, the autophagy response to moderate muscle damage is promoted by RE-induced hormonal changes in men only.

Keywords: LC3-II/LC3-I ratio; cortisol; growth hormone; macroautophagy; sex dimorphism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic diagram of the study design.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Gene expression analysis for FOXO3 (A), BECN1 (B). Data was normalized to Men EE + REST at BL. A sex × condition × time interaction was observed for FOXO3 and BECN1. Values are mean ± SD (men: n = 8; women: n = 8). *p < 0.05 vs. BL. $p < 0.05 vs. 12 h. ∧p < 0.05 vs. men. #p < 0.05 vs. EE + REST.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Protein content results for LC3-I (A), LC3-II (B), Autophagic flux (LC3-II/LC3-I) (C), and p62 (D). Data was normalized to the Men EE + REST at BL. Representative western blots (below figures) display BL, 12 h, and 24 h loading protein contents for LC3-I and LC3-II and p62 and its corresponding GAPDH (loading control) for an individual subject between conditions (EE + RE and EE + REST) run on the same gel for men and women. Values are mean ± SD (men: n = 6; women: n = 6). MW, molecular weight (kD). *p < 0.05 vs. BL (collapsing for condition). $p < 0.05 vs. 12 h (collapsing for condition). #p < 0.05 vs. EE + REST (collapsing for time). Δp < 0.05 vs. women (collapsing for time).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Bivariate correlation analysis (EE + RE and EE + REST) for LC3-I content to Cortisol area under curve (AUC) (A), Autophagy flux to Cortisol AUC (B), and Autophagy flux to Growth Hormone (GH) AUC (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buchser W. J., Laskow T. C., Pavlik P. J., Lin H.-M., Lotze M. T. (2012). Cell-mediated autophagy promotes cancer cell survival. Cancer Res. 72 2970–2979. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3396 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Call J. A., Nichenko A. S. (2020). Autophagy: an essential but limited cellular process for timely skeletal muscle recovery from injury. Autophagy 16 1344–1347. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1753000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Congdon E. E. (2018). Sex differences in autophagy contribute to female vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 12:372. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00372 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fritzen A. M., Madsen A. B., Kleinert M., Treebak J. T., Lundsgaard A., Jensen T. E., et al. (2016). Regulation of autophagy in human skeletal muscle: effects of exercise, exercise training and insulin stimulation. J. Physiol. 594 745–761. 10.1113/jp271405 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ge Y., Huang M., Yao Y.-M. (2018). Autophagy and proinflammatory cytokines: interactions and clinical implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 43 38–46. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2018.07.001 - DOI - PubMed