Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 23:9:e12404.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.12404. eCollection 2021.

Survival rates of adult and juvenile gyrfalcons in Iceland: estimates and drivers

Affiliations

Survival rates of adult and juvenile gyrfalcons in Iceland: estimates and drivers

Frédéric Barraquand et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Knowledge of survival rates and their potential covariation with environmental drivers, for both adults and juveniles, is paramount to forecast the population dynamics of long-lived animals. Long-lived bird and mammal populations are indeed very sensitive to change in survival rates, especially that of adults. Here we report the first survival estimates for the Icelandic gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) obtained by capture-mark-recapture methods. We use a mark-recapture-recovery model combining live and dead encounters into a unified analysis, in a Bayesian framework. Annual survival was estimated at 0.83 for adults and 0.40 for juveniles. Positive effects of main prey density on juvenile survival (5% increase in survival from min to max density) were possible though not likely. Weather effects on juvenile survival were even less likely. The variability in observed lifespan suggests that adult birds could suffer from human-induced alteration of survival rates.

Keywords: Capture-recapture; Gyrfalcon; Iceland; Mark-recovery; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observed capture histories of gyrfalcons (Falco rusticolus) ringed in Iceland (1973–2019), with the state sequence for individuals ringed (1-blue: live capture or resighting; 2-black: dead recovery; 3-white: neither seen nor recovered).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Logistic regression of juvenile gyrfalcon survival (s1).
(A) s1 as a function of ptarmigan abundance x1. (B) Corresponding distribution of x1. Standardized ptarmigan abundance of −1.43 (observed min) and 2.58 (observed max) were approximately 2.5 and 12.5 individuals.km−2, respectively.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barraquand F, Nielsen ÓK. Predator-prey feedback in a gyrfalcon-ptarmigan system? Ecology and Evolution. 2018;8(24):12425–12434. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barraquand F, Nielsen ÓK. Gyrfalcon survival estimation. Zenodo. 2021 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5459150. - DOI
    1. Booms T, Cade T, Clum N. Gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus), version 1.0. In: Billerman SM, editor. Birds of the World. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2020.
    1. Booms TL, Talbot SL, Sage GK, McCaffery BJ, McCracken KG, Schempf PF. Nest-site fidelity and dispersal of gyrfalcons estimated by noninvasive genetic sampling. Condor. 2011;113(4):768–778. doi: 10.1525/cond.2011.100178. - DOI
    1. Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, Lee D, Goodrich B, Betancourt M, Brubaker M, Guo J, Li P, Riddell A. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;76(1):1–32. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources