Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 11:9:753671.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753671. eCollection 2021.

Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Xiaoqian Hu  1   2 , Shuyan Gu  3 , Xuemei Zhen  4   5 , Xueshan Sun  2 , Yuxuan Gu  2 , Hengjin Dong  2   6
Affiliations

Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Xiaoqian Hu et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on trends in cognitive function among the Chinese elderly, and to explore how gender gaps in cognitive function change with age, period, and cohort. Methods: This study used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018, and included 90,432 participants aged above 65 years old. The measurement of cognitive function was the score of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cross-classified random-effect models were used to investigate age, period, and cohort trends in cognitive function. Results: Mini-Mental State Examination scores decreased with age at an increasing rate. While the cohort effect was nearly stable, the period effect demonstrated a downward trend from 1998 to 2002 followed by a nearly flat line. Females were associated with lower MMSE scores than males. When age increased, the gender gaps in MMSE scores further increased. The period-based gender gaps in MMSE scores diverged throughout the 20 years, while the cohort-based gender disparities in MMSE scores converged with successive cohorts. Conclusions: Age, period, and cohort had different and independent effects on cognitive function among the Chinese elderly. The effect of age was stronger than that of period and cohort. Gender disparities in cognitive function increased with age and period, and decreased with successive cohorts.

Keywords: China; age-period-cohort; cognition; elderly; gender disparity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall age, period, and cohort effects on MMSE scores. (A) Age. (B) Period. (C) Cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted age, period, and cohort trends in the gender disparity in MMSE scores. (A) Age. (B) Period. (C) Cohort.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Zeng Y, Feng Q, Hesketh T, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. (2017) 389:1619–29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China . National data. (2021). Available online at: http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01 (accessed July 10, 2021).
    1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division . World Population Prospects 2019. (2019). Available online at: https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/ (accessed July 10, 2021).
    1. Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali G, Wu Y, Prina M. World Alzheimer Report 2015, the Global Impact of Dementia: An Analysis of Prevalence, Incidence, Cost and Trends. (2015). London: Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI).
    1. Wu C, Gao L, Chen S, Dong H. Care services for elderly people with dementia in rural China: a case study. Bull World Health Organ. (2016) 94:167–73. 10.2471/BLT.15.160929 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources