Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 25:3:775330.
doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.775330. eCollection 2021.

Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases

Affiliations
Review

Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases

Bruna Lopes da Costa et al. Front Genome Ed. .

Abstract

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are chronic, hereditary disorders that lead to progressive degeneration of the retina. Disease etiology originates from a genetic mutation-inherited or de novo-with a majority of IRDs resulting from point mutations. Given the plethora of IRDs, to date, mutations that cause these dystrophies have been found in approximately 280 genes. However, there is currently only one FDA-approved gene augmentation therapy, Luxturna (voretigene neparvovec-rzyl), available to patients with RPE65-mediated retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Although clinical trials for other genes are underway, these techniques typically involve gene augmentation rather than genome surgery. While gene augmentation therapy delivers a healthy copy of DNA to the cells of the retina, genome surgery uses clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technology to correct a specific genetic mutation within the endogenous genome sequence. A new technique known as prime editing (PE) applies a CRISPR-based technology that possesses the potential to correct all twelve possible transition and transversion mutations as well as small insertions and deletions. EDIT-101, a CRISPR-based therapy that is currently in clinical trials, uses double-strand breaks and nonhomologous end joining to remove the IVS26 mutation in the CEP290 gene. Preferably, PE does not cause double-strand breaks nor does it require any donor DNA repair template, highlighting its unparalleled efficiency. Instead, PE uses reverse transcriptase and Cas9 nickase to repair mutations in the genome. While this technique is still developing, with several challenges yet to be addressed, it offers promising implications for the future of IRD treatment.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9 systems; Ophthalmology; adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors; gene editing; inherited retinal diseases (IRD); prime editing; retinal degeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of prime editing (PE). (A) Illustrations of all 12 kinds of DNA substitutions. (B) The machinery of PE. From the 5′ to the 3′ end, the pegRNA contains the spacer, gRNA scaffold, reverse transcription template (RTT), and primer binding sequence (PBS). “Created with BioRender”.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overview of prime editing mechanism. The spacer (red line) anneals with its complementary strand of the DNA (1) directing the H840A SpCas9 nickase to nick the PAM-containing strand (black arrow) of the target DNA (2). The primer binding sequence (PBS) then hybridizes with the nicked DNA (3) initiating the elongation of the free 3′ end according to the reverse transcription template (RTT) sequence that carries the intended edit (4). The newly synthesized strand leads to either 3′ or 5′ flap excision. The excision of the 5′ flap is favored, and it leads to the heteroduplex formation (5). The replacement of the original sequence via endogenous DNA mismatch repair mechanism incorporates the desired mutation at the target site (6). “Created with BioRender”.

References

    1. Aida T., Wilde J. J., Yang L., Hou Y., Li M., Xu D., et al. (2020). Prime Editing Primarily Induces Undesired Outcomes in Mice. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.08.06.239723 - DOI
    1. Anzalone A. V., Randolph P. B., Davis J. R., Sousa A. A., Koblan L. W., Levy J. M., et al. (2019). Search-and-Replace Genome Editing without Double-Strand Breaks or Donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157. 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anzalone A. V., Koblan L. W., Liu D. R. (2020). Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas Nucleases, Base Editors, Transposases and Prime Editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844. 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benhar I., London A., Schwartz M. (2012). The Privileged Immunity of Immune Privileged Organs: The Case of the Eye. Front. Immun. 3, 1–6. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00296 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhagwat A. M., Graumann J., Wiegandt R., Bentsen M., Welker J., Kuenne C., et al. (2020). Multicrispr: gRNA Design for Prime Editing and Parallel Targeting of Thousands of Targets. Life Sci. Alliance 3, e202000757. 10.26508/LSA.202000757 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources