Ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring system for predicting malignancy in pregnant women with ovarian mass
- PMID: 34902893
- PMCID: PMC8784942
- DOI: 10.5468/ogs.21212
Ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring system for predicting malignancy in pregnant women with ovarian mass
Abstract
During routine antenatal ultrasound examinations, an ovarian mass can be found incidentally. In clinical practice, the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian masses is essential for planning further management. Ultrasound imaging has become the most popular diagnostic tool during pregnancy, with the recent development of ultrasonography. In non-pregnant women, several methods have been used to predict malignant ovarian masses before surgery. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group reported several scoring systems, such as the IOTA simple rules, IOTA logistic regression models, and IOTA assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa. Other researchers have also evaluated the malignancy of ovarian masses before surgery using scoring systems such as the Sassone score, pelvic mass score, DePriest score, Lerner score, and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System. These researchers suggested specific features of ovarian masses that can be used for differential diagnosis, including size, proportion of solid tissue, papillary projections, inner wall structure, locules, wall thickness, septa, echogenicity, acoustic shadows, and presence of ascites. Although these factors can also be measured in pregnant women using ultrasound, only a few studies have applied ovarian scoring systems in pregnant women. In this article, we reviewed various scoring systems for predicting malignant tumors of the ovary and determined whether they can be applied to pregnant women.
Keywords: Diagnostic imaging; Ovarian cancer; Ovarian cysts; Pregnant women; Ultransonography.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian mass for predicting malignancy in pregnant women.Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Gynecol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34561098
-
Adnexal masses during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):601-612. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1291. Epub 2022 Nov 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36410423 Review.
-
Subjective Assessment of Adnexal Masses Using Various Ultrasonographic Diagnostic Models: An Analysis of Interobserver Variability.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1111/ajo.70036. Online ahead of print. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025. PMID: 40371964
-
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Sep;146(3):364-369. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12891. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31206642
-
Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of the Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model in Malignancy Prediction Among Women With Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67365. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39310483 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Ultrasound in the Assessment and Differential Diagnosis of Pelvic Pain in Pregnancy.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 5;12(3):640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030640. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35328194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 May;66(3):133-148. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22287. Epub 2023 Mar 10. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36907575 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis: Simple Rules for diagnosing ovarian tumors-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 20;14:1474930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1474930. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39902128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validity of ultrasound with color Doppler to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumours.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Mar;67(2):227-234. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23072. Epub 2024 Feb 20. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38374696 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of the Risk of Malignancy of Adnexal Masses during Pregnancy Comparing Subjective Assessment and Non-Contrast MRI Score (NCMS) in Radiologists with Different Expertise.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 25;15(21):5138. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215138. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37958313 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mohaghegh P, Rockall AG. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2012;32:1751–73. - PubMed
-
- Goh WA, Rincon M, Bohrer J, Tolosa JE, Sohaey R, Riaño R, et al. Persistent ovarian masses and pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1090–3. - PubMed
-
- Condous G, Khalid A, Okaro E, Bourne T. Should we be examining the ovaries in pregnancy? Prevalence and natural history of adnexal pathology detected at first-trimester sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:62–6. - PubMed
-
- Glanc P, Salem S, Farine D. Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q. 2008;24:225–40. - PubMed
-
- Hogston P, Lilford RJ. Ultrasound study of ovarian cysts in pregnancy: prevalence and significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:625–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical