Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138793.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38793.

Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020 According to Their Mechanism of Action

Affiliations
Observational Study

Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020 According to Their Mechanism of Action

Timothée Olivier et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Both novel and next-in-class cancer drugs have a role in oncology, but the relative development of each is understudied.

Objective: To characterize the mechanisms of action of anticancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2020, noting how many approvals were based on a new mechanism of action vs next-in-class approvals.

Design, study, and participants: This cross-sectional study included all anticancer drugs approved by the FDA from January 2009 to December 2020. The mechanism of action of each drug was extracted from FDA labels. Supportive-care treatments were excluded.

Exposures: Name of drug approved, date of approval, indication, tumor type, mechanism of action, broad pharmaceutical class, and biological target. Approvals considering all tumor types and each tumor type separately were classified in 3 nonoverlapping categories: new mechanism of action, next in class, or subsequent approval.

Main outcomes and measures: The number of all approvals each year; the number of approvals based on a new mechanism of action, either by drug (considering all tumor types) or by indication (considering tumor types separately); and the frequency of these numbers over time.

Results: Overall, 332 approvals were included. Between 2009 and 2020, there was an increase in the total number of approvals from 8 to 57. We found that 209 approvals (63%) were for a next-in-class indication in a new tumor type (84 [25%]) or a subsequent indication of the same drug in the same tumor type (195 [59%]). When considering each tumor type separately, 123 approvals (37%) were based on a new mechanism of action.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, approvals based on a new mechanism of action represented a minority of all approvals. Further consideration of incentives for drug development are needed to prioritize novel or highly innovative and transformative anticancer drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Prasad reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures during the conduct of the study; royalties from Johns Hopkins Press, Medscape, and MedPage; consulting fees from UnitedHealthcare; speaking fees from Evicore and New Century Health; and personal fees derived from Patreon backers for the Plenary Session podcast outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Total Number of Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mechanisms of Action for 332 Anticancer Drug Approvals Between 2009 and 2020
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–Approved Anticancer Drugs With New Mechanisms of Action From 2009 to 2020
A total of 3 anticancer drugs with a new mechanism of action were approved in 2009; 0 in 2010; 6 in 2011; 4 in 2012; 5 in 2013; 5 in 2014; 6 in 2015; 3 in 2016; 5 in 2017; 5 in 2018; 4 in 2019; and 7 in 2020. A total of 5 anticancer drugs with a new mechanism if action within a tumor type were approved in 2009; 3 in 2010; 10 in 2011; 8 in 2012; 5 in 2013; 9 in 2014; 11 in 2015; 6 in 2016; 12 in 2017; 18 in 2018; 12 in 2019; and 24 in 2020.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bower H, Björkholm M, Dickman PW, Höglund M, Lambert PC, Andersson TM-L. Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(24):2851-2857. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2866 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, et al. . Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(18):4117-4126. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. . Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(16):1673-1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. . Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):783-792. doi:10.1056/NEJM200103153441101 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3801. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances