Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 14;79(1):11.
doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02685-5.

Degradation of Diuron by a Bacterial Mixture and Shifts in the Bacterial Community During Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil

Affiliations

Degradation of Diuron by a Bacterial Mixture and Shifts in the Bacterial Community During Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil

Ha Danh Duc et al. Curr Microbiol. .

Abstract

Diuron, a phenylurea herbicide, has been extensively applied in controlling a wide range of weeds in several crops. In the current study, a mixed culture of three bacterial strains, i.e., Bacillus subtilis DU1, Acinetobacter baumannii DU, and Pseudomonas sp. DUK, isolated from sugarcane soil, completely degraded diuron and 3,4-DCA in liquid media at 20 mg L-1 within 48 h. During diuron degradation, a few metabolites (DCPMU, DCPU, and 3,4-DCA) were produced. Further determination of ring-cleavage pathways demonstrated that Acinetobacter baumannii DU and Pseudomonas fluorescens DUK degraded diuron and 3,4-DCA via ortho-cleavage. In contrast, Bacillus subtilis DU transformed these compounds via meta-cleavage pathways. Moreover, diuron caused a significant shift in the bacterial community in soil without diuron history. The augmentation of mountain soil with the isolated bacteria resulted in nearly three times higher degradation rate of diuron than the degradation by indigenous microorganisms. This study provides important information on in situ diuron bioremediation from contaminated sites by bioaugmentation with a mixed bacterial culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Green PG, Young TM (2006) Loading of the herbicide diuron into the California water system. Environ Eng Sci 23:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.23.545 - DOI
    1. Lapworth DJ, Gooddy DC (2006) Source and persistence of pesticides in a semi–confined chalk aquifer of southeast England. Environ Pollut 144:1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksson E, Baun A, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A (2007) Risk assessment of xenobiotics in stormwater discharged to Harrestrup Å, Denmark. Desalination 215:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.008 - DOI
    1. Thomas KV, McHugh M, Waldock M (2002) Antifouling paint booster biocides in UK coastal waters: input, occurrence and environmental fate. Sci Total Environ 293:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01153-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tucker DP (1978) Bromacil and diuron residue levels in Florida citrus soils. Pestic Monit J 12(2):47–50 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources