Endovascular versus open surgical repair for complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection
- PMID: 34905228
- PMCID: PMC8670553
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012992.pub2
Endovascular versus open surgical repair for complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection
Abstract
Background: Type B aortic dissection can lead to serious and life-threatening complications such as aortic rupture, stroke, renal failure, and paraplegia, all of which require intervention. Traditionally, these complications have been treated with open surgery. Recently however, endovascular repair has been proposed as an alternative.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of thoracic aortic endovascular repair versus open surgical repair for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD).
Search methods: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED databases, as well as the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 2 August 2021. We searched references of relevant articles retrieved through the electronic search for additional citations.
Selection criteria: We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) assessing the effects of thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD). Outcomes of interest were mortality (all-cause, dissection-related), neurological sequelae (stroke, spinal cord ischaemia/paresis-paralysis, vertebral insufficiency), morphological outcomes (false lumen thrombosis, progression of dissection, aortic diameters), acute renal failure, ischaemic symptoms (visceral ischaemia, limb ischaemia), re-intervention, and health-related quality of life.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts identified by the searches to identify those that met the inclusion criteria. From title and abstract screening, we did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that required full-text assessment. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
Main results: We did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that met the inclusion criteria for this review.
Authors' conclusions: Due to lack of RCTs or CCTs investigating the effectiveness and safety of TEVAR compared to OSR for patients with complicated CBAD, we are unable to provide any evidence to inform decision-making on the optimal intervention for these patients. High-quality RCTs or CCTs addressing this objective are necessary. However, conducting such studies will be challenging for this life-threatening disease.
Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
FJ: none known. BF: none known. EPK: none known. PMcH: none known. DV: none known. SS: none known. NH: declares that her institution has received payment from Jotec/Cryolife for her Advanced Aortic Fellowship at Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital.
Update of
- doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012992
References
Additional references
Atkins 2004
Carson 1990
-
- Carson MW, Roach MR. The strength of the aortic media and its role in the propagation of aortic dissection. Journal of Biomechanics 1990;23(6):579-88. - PubMed
Chikwe 2013
-
- Chikwe J, Cavallaro P, Itagaki S, Seigerman M, Diluozzo G, Adams DH. National outcomes in acute aortic dissection: influence of surgeon and institutional volume on operative mortality. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2013;95(5):1563-9. - PubMed
Chou 2015
-
- Chou HP, Chang HT, Chen CK, Shih CC, Sung SH, Chen TJ, et al. Outcome comparison between thoracic endovascular and open repair for type B aortic dissection: a population-based longitudinal study. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association 2015;78(4):241-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.10.003] [PMID: ] - DOI - PubMed
Criado 2011
Daily 1970
-
- Daily P, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE. Management of acute aortic dissections. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1970;10(3):237-47. - PubMed
Dake 2013
-
- Dake MD, Thompson M, Sambeek M, Vermassen F, Morales JP. DISSECT: a new mnemonic-based approach to the categorization of aortic dissection. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2013;46(2):175-90. - PubMed
DeBakey 1966
-
- DeBakey ME, Beall AC Jr, Cooley DA, Crawford ES, Morris GC Jr, Garrett HE, et al. Dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. Surgical Clinics of North America 1966;46:1045-55. - PubMed
Diehm 2013
-
- Diehm N, Vermassen F, Sambeek MR. Standardized definitions and clinical endpoints in trials investigating endovascular repair of aortic dissections. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2013;46(6):645-50. - PubMed
Eggebrecht 2006
-
- Eggebrecht H, Nienaber CA, Neuhauser M, Baumgart D, Kische S, Schmermund A, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 2006;27(4):489-98. - PubMed
Estrera 2014
Fattori 2008
-
- Fattori R, Tsai TT, Myrmel T, Evangelista A, Cooper JV, Trimarchi S, et al. Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the best option? A report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions 2008;1(4):395-402. - PubMed
Fattori 2013
-
- Fattori R, Cao P, De Rango P, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type B aortic dissection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013;61(16):1661-78. - PubMed
Gasser 2006
-
- Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA. Modeling the propagation of arterial dissection. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 2006;25(4):617-33.
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
-
- GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015. Available at gradepro.org.
Guyatt 2008
Hagan 2000
-
- Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). JAMA 2000;283(7):897-903. - PubMed
He 2020
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Hughes 2013
-
- Hughes GC, Andersen N, McCann RL. Management of acute type B aortic dissection. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013;145(3):202-7. - PubMed
Lansman 2002
-
- Lansman SL, Hagl C, Fink D, Galla JD, Spielvogel D, Ergin MA, et al. Acute type B aortic dissection: surgical therapy. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2002;74(5):1833-5. - PubMed
Larson 1984
-
- Larson EW, Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. American Journal of Cardiology 1984;53(6):849-55. - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
-
- Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6. Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Liberati 2009
Nienaber 1999
Parmar 1998
-
- Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815-34. - PubMed
Parsa 2010
-
- Parsa CJ, Schroder JN, Daneshmand MA, McCann RL, Hughes GC. Mid term results for endovascular repair of complicated acute and chronic type B aortic dissection. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2010;89(1):97-102. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
-
- Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Riambau 2017
-
- Riambau V, Böckler D, Brunkwall J, Cao P, Chiesa R, Coppi G, et al. Management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2017;53(1):4-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005] [PMID: ] - DOI - PubMed
Rylski 2019
Schünemann 2006
-
- Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Bria WF, El-Solh AA, Ernst A, et al. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2006;174(5):605-14. - PubMed
Takkenberg 2003
-
- Takkenberg JJ, Eijkemans MJ, Herwerden LA, Steyerberg EW, Lane MM, Elkins RC, et al. Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2003;75(5):1482-9. - PubMed
Thrumurthy 2011
-
- Thrumurthy SG, Karthikesalingam A, Patterson BO, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, et al. A systematic review of mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of chronic type B aortic dissection. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2011;42(5):632-47. - PubMed
Tian 2014
Tierney 2007
References to other published versions of this review
Fitzgibbon 2018
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
