Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;72(6):540-555.
doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.2000903. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

Developing innovative treatment technologies for PFAS-containing wastes

Affiliations
Review

Developing innovative treatment technologies for PFAS-containing wastes

Chelsea Berg et al. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

The release of persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment is a major concern for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). To complement its ongoing research efforts addressing PFAS contamination, the U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) commissioned the PFAS Innovative Treatment Team (PITT) to provide new perspectives on treatment and disposal of high priority PFAS-containing wastes. During its six-month tenure, the team was charged with identifying and developing promising solutions to destroy PFAS. The PITT examined emerging technologies for PFAS waste treatment and selected four technologies for further investigation. These technologies included mechanochemical treatment, electrochemical oxidation, gasification and pyrolysis, and supercritical water oxidation. This paper highlights these four technologies and discusses their prospects and the development needed before potentially becoming available solutions to address PFAS-contaminated waste.Implications: This paper examines four novel, non-combustion technologies or applications for the treatment of persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) wastes. These technologies are introduced to the reader along with their current state of development and areas for further development. This information will be useful for developers, policy makers, and facility managers that are facing increasing issues with disposal of PFAS wastes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Decision factors discussed about all technologies. Four technologies were selected based upon these factors.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Innovative treatment technology considerations.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Characteristics of PFAS contaminated matrices.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Crosswalk between PFAS waste and innovative Technology Readiness Level (TRL). Colors correspond to TRL categories described in Figure 5. No color indicates the non-applicability (N/A) of the technology to the waste stream.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Key for Figure 4 technology readiness levels. Note that technologies were rated for PFAS destruction and may not capture their full capacity or overall readiness-level for other treatment purposes. Source: https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/technology-readiness-levels.

References

    1. 374water. 2020. Supercritical Water Oxidation (SCWO) destruction of PFAS contaminated municipal sludge. Accessed 2021. https://www.bluetechforum.com/wp-content/uploads/1.-374Water-BlueTech-Ca...
    1. Abeln J, Kluth M, Petrich G, and Schmieder H. 2001. Supercritical water oxidation (SCWO): A process for the treatment of industrial waste effluents. High Press Res 20 (1– 6):537–47. doi:10.1080/08957950108206202. - DOI
    1. Acheson C, Mills M, Krause M, and Thoma E. 2021. Potential PFAS destruction technology: pyrolysis and gasification. In U.S. EPA Research Briefs. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2021-01/documents/pitt_resear...
    1. Alder AC, and van der Voet J. 2015. Occurrence and point source characterization of perfluoroalkyl acids in sewage sludge. Chemosphere 129:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aro R, Eriksson U, Kärrman A, Chen F, Wang T, and Yeung LW. 2021. Fluorine mass balance analysis of effluent and sludge from Nordic Countries. ACS ES&T Water 1 (9):2087–96. doi:10.1021/acsestwater.1c00168. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms