Accuracy and Repeatability of Internet-ordered Spectacle Lenses
- PMID: 34905522
- DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001817
Accuracy and Repeatability of Internet-ordered Spectacle Lenses
Abstract
Significance: Both consumers and eye care practitioners need to know how well online optical vendors conform with the accepted standards for quality and safety. We found that almost 1 in 10 prescriptions failed to meet national standards, which is a significant improvement over previous studies.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and repeatability of spectacle lens prescriptions ordered from a sample of online vendors.
Methods: Spectacle lens prescriptions were ordered by paid participants with no optical training who were masked to the study objectives. The prescription powers ordered (sphere, cylinder, and axis) were statistically sampled from 1000 previously filled prescriptions. A total of 100 orders were placed with each of three online vendors that included a range of high- and low-powered single vision lenses and progressive addition lenses, and duplicate orders to assess repeatability. An independent certified testing laboratory was contracted to assess conformance with voluntary consensus standards (ANSI Z80.1-2015) and Food and Drug Administration drop-ball safety testing. Lenses not meeting these standards were counted as failures.
Results: The overall failure rates for the three vendors were 11.2 ± 3.2% (vendor A), 8.0 ± 2.7% (vendor B), and 8.2 ± 2.8% (vendor C). The repeatability for 20 prescriptions ordered five times from each vendor was high, with correlation coefficients greater than 90%. There were no observed lens impact failures.
Conclusions: Almost 1 in 10 spectacle lens prescriptions ordered from three online vendors failed to meet national standards for optical quality. Additional studies are needed to assess eyewear ordered online for other important patient-specific variables that can influence visual performance and ultimate acceptability of prescription eyewear, such as lens placement relative to the visual axis, frame fit, and cosmetic acceptability.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Optometry.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest.
References
-
- Vision Monday. Americans Use Online Access as a Shopping Tool for Eyewear Purchases. March 28, 2018. Available at: http://www.visionmonday.com/business/research-and-stats/article/american... . Accessed July 25, 2019.
-
- Statista. Spectacle Lenses—United States. Available at: https://www.statista.com/outlook/12010000/109/spectacle-lenses/united-st... . Accessed July 25, 2019.
-
- Citek K, Torgersen DL, Endres JD, et al. Safety and Compliance of Prescription Spectacles Ordered by the Public via the Internet. Optometry 2011;82:549–55.
-
- Kleinstein RN. Vision Disorders in Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health 1984;5:369–84.
-
- Chia EM, Mitchell P, Ojaimi E, et al. Assessment of Vision-related Quality of Life in an Older Population Subsample: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:371–7.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical