Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;24(1):109-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Cost-effectiveness of genome sequencing for diagnosing patients with undiagnosed rare genetic diseases

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Cost-effectiveness of genome sequencing for diagnosing patients with undiagnosed rare genetic diseases

Devin Incerti et al. Genet Med. 2022 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of genome sequencing (GS) for diagnosing critically ill infants and noncritically ill pediatric patients (children) with suspected rare genetic diseases from a United States health sector perspective.

Methods: A decision-analytic model was developed to simulate the diagnostic trajectory of patients. Parameter estimates were derived from a targeted literature review and meta-analysis. The model simulated clinical and economic outcomes associated with 3 diagnostic pathways: (1) standard diagnostic care, (2) GS, and (3) standard diagnostic care followed by GS.

Results: For children, costs of GS ($7284) were similar to that of standard care ($7355) and lower than that of standard care followed by GS pathways ($12,030). In critically ill infants, when cost estimates were based on the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, the lowest cost pathway was GS ($209,472). When only diagnostic test costs were included, the cost per diagnosis was $17,940 for standard, $17,019 for GS, and $20,255 for standard care followed by GS.

Conclusion: The results of this economic model suggest that GS may be cost neutral or possibly cost saving as a first line diagnostic tool for children and critically ill infants.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Genetic disease; Genome sequencing; Rare disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Brock E. Schroeder, Nina Gonzaludo, John W. Belmont are employees and stockholders of Illumina, Inc. Devin Incerti, Xiang-Ming Xi, and Jacquelyn W. Chou are employed by Precision Health Economics, a health economics and outcomes research consultancy. The work described in this manuscript was funded by Illumina, Inc.

LinkOut - more resources