Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):23921.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03154-6.

Calibration of two validated SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assays for COVID-19 vaccine evaluation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Calibration of two validated SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assays for COVID-19 vaccine evaluation

Yunda Huang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) are key biomarkers considered to be associated with vaccine efficacy. In United States government-sponsored phase 3 efficacy trials of COVID-19 vaccines, nAbs are measured by two different validated pseudovirus-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays, with each trial using one of the two assays. Here we describe and compare the nAb titers obtained in the two assays. We observe that one assay consistently yielded higher nAb titers than the other when both assays were performed on the World Health Organization's anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin International Standard, COVID-19 convalescent sera, and mRNA-1273 vaccinee sera. To overcome the challenge this difference in readout poses in comparing/combining data from the two assays, we evaluate three calibration approaches and show that readouts from the two assays can be calibrated to a common scale. These results may aid decision-making based on data from these assays for the evaluation and licensure of new or adapted COVID-19 vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distributions of pre-calibration ID50 (Panel A) and ID80 (Panel B) titers measured by the Duke and Monogram labs of convalescent patient samples, vaccine recipient samples, and the WHO International Standard sample. For the convalescent samples, the assay lower limit of detection (LLoD) is set at 20 for Duke and 40 for Monogram, the reciprocal of the starting dilution of each assay (these titers are also considered as the positivity cutoff values). For the vaccine samples collected at Day 29 and Day 57, 4 weeks post the first and the second Moderna doses, respectively, and the WHO I.S. sample, the assay LLoD is set at 10 for Duke and 40 for Monogram, the reciprocal of the starting dilution of each assay (these titers are also considered as the positivity cutoff values). Circle-shape points indicate titers > LLoD; triangle-shape points indicate titers ≤ LLoD.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distributions of calibrated ID50 (Panel A) and ID80 (Panel B) titers of vaccine recipient samples collected at Day 29 and Day 57, estimated by the three calibration approaches. In Approach 1, titers from each lab are calibrated to the WHO International Standard using the arithmetic mean-based calibration factor, expressed in International Units (IU50/ml for ID50; IU80/ml for ID80); in Approach 2, titers from each lab are calibrated to a common scale using an independent pool of clinical samples, assuming a bivariate normal distribution for the readouts from the two labs; in Approach 3, titers from the non-reference lab (Duke) calibrated to the reference lab (Monogram) using an independent pool of clinical samples, based on regressing titers from the reference lab on the non-reference lab. Circle-shape points indicate pre-calibration titers > LLoD; triangle-shape points indicate pre-calibration titers ≤ LLoD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatterplots of calibrated ID50 (Panel A) and ID80 (Panel B) titers from the Duke and Monogram labs demonstrating performance of the three calibration approaches using vaccine recipient samples collected at Day 29 (turquoise) and Day 57 (orange), 4 weeks post the first and the second mRNA-1273 vaccine doses, respectively. The arithmetic mean-based calibration factor was used in Approach 1. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and 95% confidence intervals indicate the level of agreement between the x- and y-axis values. ID50, ID80: ID50, ID80 titers calibrated to the WHO International Standard, expressed in International Units per ml (IU50/ml for ID50; IU80/ml for ID80) (Approach 1). BIVN-ID50, BIVN-ID80: ID50, ID80 titers from each lab calibrated to a common scale using an independent pool of clinical samples, assuming a bivariate normal distribution for the readouts from the two labs (Approach 2). REG-ID50, REG-ID80: ID50, ID80 titers from the non-reference lab (Duke) calibrated to the reference lab (Monogram) using an independent pool of clinical samples, based on regressing titers from the reference lab on the non-reference lab (Approach 3).

Update of

References

    1. Connors M, Graham BS, Lane HC, Fauci AS. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: Much Accomplished, Much to Learn. Ann. Int. Med. 2021;174:687–690. doi: 10.7326/M21-0111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGill COVID19 Vaccine Tracker Team COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/ Last updated 5 Mar, 2021. Access date 8 Mar, 2021.
    1. Baden LR, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:403–416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voysey, M. et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polack, F. P. et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances